Author:
Ghanem Mohamed,Zajonz Dirk,Heyde Christoph-Eckhard,Roth Andreas
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The purpose of this study was to provide a practicable and contemporary classification system that is reliable and pragmatic with respect to perioperative evaluation, planning, scientific comparison and analysis.
Material and methods
This was a retrospective study of 160 patients who underwent acetabular revision surgery after THR due to loosening of the acetabular cup. The assessment of the acetabular defect was based on intraoperative description of the bony configuration of the acetabulum as well as on standardized preoperative planning images (pelvic overview and axial view of the hip joint). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was carried out in individual cases.
Results
Acetabular bone defects were classified into 4 types based on whether or not a 3-point fixation of the acetabular cup within the boundaries of the acetabular cavity was possible. Minor segmental defects or cup loosening without bone loss can be treated with standard hemispherical acetabular components. Bone loss can be filled with bone grafts and/or treated by the appropriate acetabular component in order to ensure stable anchorage. When conventional revision cups are no longer suitable a custom made partial pelvic replacement can be used.
Conclusion
The proposed classification mainly relies on intraoperative findings which were confirmed by preoperative imaging in 154 cases out of 160 (96.25%); however, meticulous preoperative planning based on X‑ray radiographs must be carried out. In addition, a CT scan must be performed whenever type III or type IV defects are anticipated. Compared to the existing classification systems, we can state that our classification system is practicable and pragmatic and simplifies the assessment of bone defects.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference22 articles.
1. Bettin D, Katthagen BD (1997) Die DGOT-Klassifikation von Knochendefekten bei Hüfttotalendoprothesen-Revisionsoperationen. Z Orthop Unfall 135:281–284
2. Campbell DG, Garbuz DS, Masri BA et al (2001) Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:83
3. D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS et al (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 243:126
4. Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (2016) EPRD Jahresbericht 2016. https://www.eprd.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Dateien/Publikationen/Berichte/EPRD-Jahresbericht_2016_Einzelseiten_Online-Version.pdf. Accessed 07.11.2019
5. Engh CA, Glassman AH (1991) Cementless revision of failed total hip replacement: an update. Instr Course Lect 40:189
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献