Quantum Reconstructions as Stepping Stones Toward ψ-Doxastic Interpretations?

Author:

Berghofer Philipp

Abstract

AbstractIn quantum foundations, there is growing interest in the program of reconstructing the quantum formalism from clear physical principles. These reconstructions are formulated in an operational framework, deriving the formalism from information-theoretic principles. It has been recognized that this project is in tension with standard ψ-ontic interpretations. This paper presupposes that the quantum reconstruction program (QRP) (i) is a worthwhile project and (ii) puts pressure on ψ-ontic interpretations. Where does this leave us? Prima facie, it seems that ψ-epistemic interpretations perfectly fit the spirit of information-based reconstructions. However, ψ-epistemic interpretations, understood as saying that the wave functions represents one’s knowledge about a physical system, recently have been challenged on technical and conceptual grounds. More importantly, for some researchers working on reconstructions, the lesson of successful reconstructions is that the wave function does not represent objective facts about the world. Since knowledge is a factive concept, this speaks against epistemic interpretations. In this paper, I discuss whether ψ-doxastic interpretations constitute a reasonable alternative. My thesis is that if we want to engage QRP with ψ-doxastic interpretations, then we should aim at a reconstruction that is spelled out in non-factive experiential terms.

Funder

Austrian Science Fund

University of Graz

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference90 articles.

1. Adlam, E.: Operational theories as structural realism. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part A 94, 99–111 (2022)

2. Albertazzi, L. (ed.): Handbook of Experimental Phenomenology. Wiley-Blackell, Malden (2013)

3. Appleby, M., Fuchs, C., Stacey, B., Zhu, H.: Introducing the Qplex: a novel arena for quantum theory. Eur. Phys. J. D 71, 197 (2017)

4. Berghofer, P.: Scientific perspectivism in the phenomenological tradition. Eur. J. Philos. Sci. 10(3), 1–27 (2020)

5. Berghofer, P.: The Justificatory Force of Experiences. Springer, Cham (2022)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3