Abstract
AbstractIn General Relativity in Hamiltonian form, change has seemed to be missing, defined only asymptotically, or otherwise obscured at best, because the Hamiltonian is a sum of first-class constraints and a boundary term and thus supposedly generates gauge transformations. By construing change as essential time dependence (lack of a time-like Killing vector field), one can find change locally in vacuum GR in the Hamiltonian formulation just where it should be. But what if spinors are present? This paper is motivated by the tendency in space-time philosophy tends to slight fermionic/spinorial matter, the tendency in Hamiltonian GR to misplace changes of time coordinate, and the tendency in treatments of the Einstein-Dirac equation to include a gratuitous local Lorentz gauge symmetry along with the physically significant coordinate freedom. Spatial dependence is dropped in most of the paper, both restricting the physical situation and largely fixing the spatial coordinates. In the interest of including all and only the coordinate freedom, the Einstein-Dirac equation is investigated using the Schwinger time gauge and Kibble-Deser symmetric triad condition are employed as a $$3+1$$
3
+
1
version of the DeWitt-Ogievetsky-Polubarinov nonlinear group realization formalism that dispenses with a tetrad and local Lorentz gauge freedom. Change is the lack of a time-like stronger-than-Killing field for which the Lie derivative of the metric-spinor complex vanishes. An appropriate $$3+1$$
3
+
1
-friendly form of the Rosenfeld-Anderson-Bergmann-Castellani gauge generator G, a tuned sum of first class-constraints, is shown to change the canonical Lagrangian by a total derivative, implying the preservation of Hamilton’s equations. Given the essential presence of second-class constraints with spinors and their lack of resemblance to a gauge theory (unlike, say, massive photons), it is useful to have an explicit physically interesting example. This gauge generator implements changes of time coordinate for solutions of the equations of motion, showing that the gauge generator makes sense even with spinors.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference105 articles.
1. Anderson, J.L.: Absolute change in general relativity. In: Casciaro, B., Fortunato, D., Francaviglia, M., Masiello, A. (eds.) Recent Developments in General Relativity, pp. 121–126. Pergamon and PWN, Oxford (1962)
2. Isham, C.J.: Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time. In: Ibort, L.A., Rodríguez, M.A. (Eds.), Integrable Systems, Quantum Groups, and Quantum Field Theories, pages 157–287. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Lectures presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute “Recent Problems in Mathematical Physics,” Salamanca, June 15–27, 1992. arXiv:gr-qc/9210011 (1993)
3. Gordon, B., Earman, J.: Pre-socratic quantum gravity. In: Callender, C., Huggett, N. (eds.) Philosophy Meets Physics at the Planck Scale, pp. 213–255. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
4. Earman, J.: Thoroughly modern McTaggart: Or, What McTaggart would have said if he had read the General Theory of Relativity. Philosophers’ Imprint, 2(3). http://www.philosophersimprint.org/ (2002)
5. Rickles, D.: Time and structure in canonical gravity. In: Rickles, D., French, S., Saatsi, J. (eds.) Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, pp. 152–195. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2006)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献