Abstract
AbstractWe show that there is a hidden freedom in quantum many-body theory associated with overcompleteness of the time evolution through the single-particle subspace of a many-body system. To fix the freedom, an additional constraint is necessary. We argue that the appropriate constraint on the time evolution through the subspace is to quantize the propagation of entangled pairs of particles, represented by the single-particle spectral function, instead of individual particles. This solution method creates a surface that indicates the multiplicity of every solution to the inverse problem defined by matching the freedom to the constraint. Upon measurement, the system collapses nonlocally onto a single quantized solution. In addition to a combinatoric multiplicity, each solution acquires a multiplicity due to its stability when subject to a small variation in the microscopic degrees of freedom. Numerical calculations for a two-level system show that our theory improves upon standard theory in the description of non-quasiparticle spectral features. Our reinterpretation of quantum many-body theory is not based on the Born rule and offers a more faithful representation of experiments than current theory by modeling individual, quantized events with an explicit collapse model.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference10 articles.
1. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
2. Fetter, A.L., Walecka, J.D.: Quantum Theory of Many-particle Systems. Courier Dover Publications, Mineola, NY (1971)
3. Martin, R.M., Reining, L., Ceperley, D.M.: Interacting Electrons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)
4. Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., Olsen, J.: Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory. Wiley, West Sussex (2014)
5. Born, M.: Quantenmechanik der stoßvorgänge. Z. Phys. 38(11), 803–827 (1926)