Abstract
AbstractEternalism is the view that all times are equally real. The relativity of simultaneity in special relativity backs this up. There is no cosmically extended, self-existing ‘now.’ This leads to a tricky problem. What makes statements about the present true? I shall approach the problem along the lines of perspectival realism and argue that the choice of the perspective does. To corroborate this point, the Lorentz transformations of special relativity are compared to the structurally similar equations of the Doppler effect. The ‘now’ is perspectivally real in the same way as a particular electromagnetic spectrum frequency. I also argue that the ontology of time licensed by perspectival realism is more credible in this context than its current alternative, the fragmentalist interpretation of special relativity.
Funder
Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
Tampere University including Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University of Applied Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference35 articles.
1. Armstrong, D.M.: Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge University Press, New York (2004)
2. Bardon, A.: A Brief History of the Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press, New York (2013)
3. Baron, S.: Time, physics, and philosophy: it’s all relative. Philos. Compass 13(1), 1–14 (2018)
4. Baron, S.: Presentism, truth and supervenience. Ratio 26(1), 3–18 (2013)
5. Bell, J.S.: How to Teach special relativity. Prog. Sci. Cult. 1(2), 1–13 (1976)
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献