Challenges of participatory design in apartment buildings’ renovation projects in Finland

Author:

Soikkeli AnuORCID,Santamäki Emmi,Hynninen Oona,Äijälä Saara

Abstract

AbstractParticipatory and user-centered design has taken inspiration from each other, and the classical roles of users, researchers, and designers have merged in the co-designing process. Participatory methods consider the balance of power between the designer and residents and the needs and usefulness of the research. Community members should be involved as partners, advisors, and participants.In Finland, participatory design is law mandated in urban planning projects, but participation that goes beyond the initial publicization of information, is genuinely interactive, and spans all stages of the project is underutilised and the methods of participatory practice are still unfamiliar to many designers. The methods commonly used are the research survey and the workshop, often mentioned as participatory design methods. From the residents’ perspective, participation only becomes participatory when the participant gains the experience of influencing the development and its outcomes. The article examines resident surveys and workshops as tools to produce information and evaluate their interactivity in two case studies. It shows that the diversification of methods is necessary to ensure genuine participatory planning in the renewal of suburban neighborhoods.The research was done as part of the project Reshaping living: New structure and new life for old suburbs (AsuMut), funded by the Ministry of Environment.

Funder

Ministry of Environment, Finland

University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Urban Studies,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference53 articles.

1. Äijälä, S. (2022). Participatory methods: user participation in Architecture. University of Oulu. (To be published 11/2022). http://jultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfioulu-202211143572.pdf

2. Bannon, L. J., & Ehn, P. (2013). Design. In J. Simonsen, & T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge.

3. Battiste, M. (2008). Research Ethics for protecting Indigenous Knowledge and Heritage. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 497–511). SAGE Publications.

4. Binder, T., Brandt, E., Ehn, P., & Halse, J. (2015). Democratic design experiments: between parliament and laboratory. CoDesign, 11(3–4), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248.

5. Brandt, E., Binder, T., & Sanders, E. B. N. (2013). Tools and techniques: ways to engage telling, making and enacting. In J. Simonsen, & T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (pp. 145–181). Routledge.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3