Abstract
AbstractFollowing World War I, rent control became a standard policy response to the housing shortage and the resulting rent increases. Typically, economists blame it for creating inefficiencies in the housing market and beyond. We investigate whether rental market regulations (including rent control, protection of tenants from eviction, and housing rationing) had any effects in a middle-income Latin American economy, such as Argentina. To answer this question, we take advantage of a wide range of housing market indicators and restrictive rental regulation indices covering almost one century. Using a standard OLS model and MARS, a nonlinear estimation technique, we find that rental market regulations have exerted a statistically significant negative impact on the growth rates of the real housing rents. However, they were only effective for short periods following both World Wars, when regulations were novel and particularly strong.
Funder
Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung e.V. (DIW Berlin)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Urban Studies,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference36 articles.
1. Arnott, R. (1995). Time for revisionism on rent control? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(1), 99–120.
2. Astorga González, A. (1995). La ciudad como conjunto de viviendas: la función residencial. Espacio, Tiempo y Forma V, I(8), 101–118.
3. Ault, R. W., Jackson, J. D., & Saba, R. P. (1994). The effect of long-term rent control on tenant mobility. Journal of Urban Economics, 35(2), 140–158.
4. Autor, D. H., Palmer, C. J., & Pathak, P. A. (2014). Housing market spillovers: Evidence from the end of rent control in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Journal of Political Economy, 122(3), 661–717.
5. Benítez, J. (2016). Buscar un techo. La problemática de los inquilinos y los alquileres en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Colección es nuestra la ciudad, 2, 5–8.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献