Evaluating universal design of built environments: an empirical study of stakeholder practice and perceptions

Author:

Watchorn ValerieORCID,Hitch DanielleORCID,Tucker RichardORCID,Frawley PatsieORCID,Aedy Kathryn,Grant Cathryn

Abstract

AbstractUniversal design aims to reduce environmental barriers and enhance usability of buildings for all people, particularly those with disabilities. There are known challenges relating to the evaluation of universal design and evidence supporting this concept is limited. This study aimed to gather information on current practice and what stakeholders perceive as important to universal design evaluation. A mixed methods approach was employed, and data were collected via online survey (n = 157) and semi-structured interviews (n = 37). Participants included industry professionals, policy makers, government officials, academics, and people with disabilities. Just over one-third of participants stated that they had experience of evaluating universal design in public built environments. Checklists were most commonly used, yet participants expressed concern with their suitability for this purpose. Almost all participants perceived evaluation of universal design as important, citing its value to advocacy, professional development and strengthening the evidence base of universal design. Findings from this study highlight a tension between a desire for efficiency and consistency, as offered by a checklist approach, and the adoption of a holistic and multidisciplinary method of evaluation that encompasses the complexity of universal design application.

Funder

School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University

Deakin University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Urban Studies,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference66 articles.

1. Access Institute (2017). What is an Access Audit? Retrieved October 16, 2020, from https://accessinstitute.com.au/what-is-an-access-audit/#:~:text=The%20common%20understanding%20is%20that,access%20legislation%2 C%20codes%20and%20standards

2. Afacan, Y., & Erbug, C. (2009). An interdisciplinary heuristic evaluation method for universal building design. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.002

3. Association of Consultants in Access Australia (ACAA) (2019). What an Access Consultant can do for you. Association of Consultants in Access Australia (ACAA). Retrieved February 6, 2021, from https://www.access.asn.au/accessibility-resources/what-an-access-consultant-can-do-for-you

4. Australian Government Department of Social Services (2019). Right to opportunity. Consultation report to help shape the next national disability strategy. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Social Services. Retrieved November 1, 2021 from https://www.dss.gov.au/disability-and-carers-a-new-national-disability-strategy-reports/right-to-opportunity-consultation-report-to-help-shape-the-next-national-disability-strategy-full-report

5. Bamzar, R. (2019). Assessing the quality of the indoor environment of senior housing for a better mobility: a Swedish case study. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34(1), 23–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-018-9623-4

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3