Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To compare methods of relative intensity prescription for their ability to normalise performance (i.e., time to exhaustion), physiological, and perceptual responses to high-intensity interval training (HIIT) between individuals.
Methods
Sixteen male and two female cyclists (age: 38 ± 11 years, height: 177 ± 7 cm, body mass: 71.6 ± 7.9 kg, maximal oxygen uptake ($$ \dot{\text{V}} $$
V
˙
O2max): 54.3 ± 8.9 ml·kg−1 min−1) initially undertook an incremental test to exhaustion, a 3 min all-out test, and a 20 min time-trial to determine prescription benchmarks. Then, four HIIT sessions (4 min on, 2 min off) were each performed to exhaustion at: the work rate associated with the gas exchange threshold ($$ \dot{\text{W}} $$
W
˙
GET) plus 70% of the difference between $$ \dot{\text{W}} $$
W
˙
GET and the work rate associated with $$ \dot{\text{V}} $$
V
˙
O2max; 85% of the maximal work rate of the incremental test (85%$$ \dot{\text{W}} $$
W
˙
max); 120% of the mean work rate of the 20 min time-trial (120%TT); and the work rate predicted to expend, in 4 min, 80% of the work capacity above critical power. Acute HIIT responses were modelled with participant as a random effect to provide estimates of inter-individual variability.
Results
For all dependent variables, the magnitude of inter-individual variability was high, and confidence intervals overlapped substantially, indicating that the relative intensity normalisation methods were similarly poor. Inter-individual coefficients of variation for time to exhaustion varied from 44.2% (85%$$ \dot{\text{W}} $$
W
˙
max) to 59.1% (120%TT), making it difficult to predict acute HIIT responses for an individual.
Conclusion
The present study suggests that the methods of intensity prescription investigated do not normalise acute responses to HIIT between individuals.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Physiology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Physiology
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献