Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in preschoolers (4–6 years) represents a challenge. Most studies investigating CPET have been limited to older children (> 8 year). However, knowledge of the performance of small children is essential for evaluating their cardiorespiratory fitness. This study strives to compare a modified Bruce protocol with a new age-appropriate incremental CPET during natural movement running outdoors, using a mobile device.
Methods
A group of 22 4–6-year-old healthy children was tested indoor on a treadmill (TM) using the modified Bruce protocol. The results were compared with a self-paced incremental running test, using a mobile CPET device in an outdoor park. The speeds were described as (1) slow walking, (2) slow running, (3) regular running, and (4) running with full speed as long as possible.
Results
Mean exercise time outdoors (6,57 min) was significantly shorter than on the treadmill (11,20 min), $$\dot{V}{O}_{2peak}$$
V
˙
O
2
p
e
a
k
(51.1 ml/min/kg vs. 40.1 ml/min/kg), RER (1.1 vs. 0.98) and important CPET parameters such as $$\dot{V}E$$
V
˙
E
max, O2pulse, heart rate and breath rate were significantly higher outdoors. The submaximal parameter OUES was comparable between both the tests.
Conclusions
Testing very young children with a mobile device is a new alternative to treadmill testing. With a significantly shorter test duration, significantly higher values for almost all cardiopulmonary variables can be achieved without losing the ability to determine VT1 and VT2. It avoids common treadmill problems and allows for individualized exercise testing. The aim is to standardize exercise times with individual protocols instead of standardizing protocols with individual exercise times, allowing for better comparability.
Funder
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Physiology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Physiology
Reference43 articles.
1. Akkerman M, van Brussel M, Bongers BC, Hulzebos EH, Helders PJ, Takken T (2010) Oxygen uptake efficiency slope in healthy children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 22:431–441
2. Armstrong N, Welsman J (2001) Peak oxygen uptake in relation to growth and maturation in 11- to 17–year-old humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 85:546–551
3. Armstrong N, Williams J, Balding J, Gentle P, Kirby B (1991) The peak oxygen uptake of British children with reference to age, sex and sexual maturity. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 62:369–375
4. Baba R, Nagashima M, Goto M, Nagano Y, Yokota M, Tauchi N, Nishibata K (1996) Oxygen uptake efficiency slope: a new index of cardiorespiratory functional reserve derived from the relation between oxygen uptake and minute ventilation during incremental exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1567–1572
5. Baba R, Kubo N, Morotome Y, Iwagaki S (1999) Reproducibility of the oxygen uptake efficiency slope in normal healthy subjects. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 39:202–206
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献