Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Genetic factors are important in terms of athletic performance. Recent studies to determine the relationship between the genes that lead to physiological responses have attracted attention. In this respect, this meta-analysis study was designed to examine the relationship between genetic polymorphism (BDKRB2 rs5810761, GNB3 rs5443, HIF1A rs11549565, MCT1 rs1049434, NOS3 rs2070744) and endurance athlete’s status.
Methods
The search included studies published from 2009 to 2022. To determine the relevant studies, Pubmed, Web of Science databases were systematically scanned. Only case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. To determine the relevant studies, Pubmed, Web of Science databases were systematically scanned, and a total of 31 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Relevant data from the included studies were collected and analyzed using a random effects or fixed effects model. The effect size was calculated as the odds ratio or a risk ratio the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Results
According to the results of the analysis, BDKRB2 rs5810761 + 9 allele, and NOS3 rs2070744 T allele were significantly more prevalent in endurance athletes (p < 0.05). Genotype distributions of BDKRB2 rs5810761, MCT1 rs1049434, and NOS3 rs2070744 showed significant differences in the dominant model (p < 0.05). However, no significant association was found between endurance athlete status and GNB3 rs5443 and HIF1A rs11549465 polymorphisms.
Conclusion
These results show that some gene polymorphisms play an important role in endurance athlete status and suggest that having a specific genetic basis may also confer a physiological advantage for performance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Ahmetov II, Fedotovskaya ON (2015) Current progress in sports genomics. Advances in clinical chemistry. Academic Press Inc, pp 247–314
2. Ahmetov II, Hakimullina AM, Lyubaeva EV, Vinogradova OL, Rogozkin VA (2008) Effect of HIF1A Gene Polymorphism on Human Muscle Performance. Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-008-0291-3
3. Ben-Zaken S, Eliakim A, Nemet D, Rabinovich M, Kassem E, Meckel Y (2015) Differences in MCT1 A1470T polymorphism prevalence between runners and swimmers. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25(3):365–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/SMS.12226
4. Bosnyák E, Trájer E, Alszászi G, Móra Á, Györe I, Udvardy A, Tóth M, Szmodis M (2020) Lack of association between the GNB3 rs5443, HIF1A rs11549465 polymorphisms, physiological and functional characteristics. Ann Hum Genet 84(5):393–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/AHG.12387
5. Braun A, Kammerer S, Maier E, Roscher AA (1996) I mmunopharmacol ogy Polymorphisms in the gene for the human B2-bradykinin receptor. new tools in assessing a genetic risk for bradykinin-associated diseases. Immunopharmacology. Elsevıer