Coproducing Wellbeing Policy: A Theory of Thriving in Financial Hardship

Author:

Fabian Mark,Alexandrova Anna,Nair Yamini Cinamon

Abstract

AbstractWe describe a replicable process for coproducing a theory of ‘thriving’, or more broadly ‘wellbeing’, in partnership with stakeholders to inform an area of policy. Coproduction promotes effectiveness, practicality, and legitimacy of wellbeing policies by combining insights from people with lived experience of that policy, the practitioners who implement it, and technical experts with relevant area specific knowledge. We illustrate our methodology using a case study of a coproduction exercise between wellbeing researchers and practitioners and users of Turn2us, a UK-based anti-poverty charity. We report both the process developed for this collaboration and the bespoke theory and measures of thriving in financial hardship that emerged from it. We emphasise the interplay between different types of inputs: quantitative and qualitative data, academic theories of wellbeing and lived experience, and formal and informal insights. Our experience demonstrates the value of contextualising wellbeing for practical contexts, serving as an important complement to top-down approaches relying on standardised theories and metrics.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference44 articles.

1. Alexandrova, A. (2017). A philosophy for the science of wellbeing. Oxford University Press.

2. Alexandrova, A., & Fabian, M. (2022). Democratising measurement: Or why thick concepts call for coproduction. European Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 12(7), 1–23.

3. Alkire, S. (2005). Why the capability approach? Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 115–135.

4. Anderson, E. (2002). Situated knowledge and the interplay of value judgments and evidence in scientific inquiry. The scope of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (pp. 497–517). Springer.

5. Anderson, I., & Jæger, B. (1999). Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: Towards more democratic decision-making. Science and Policy, 26(5), 331–340.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3