Abstract
Abstract
Interviewers in face-to-face surveys can potentially introduce bias both in the recruiting and the measurement phase. One reason behind this is that the measurement of subjective well-being has been found to be associated with social desirability bias. Respondents tend to tailor their responses in the presence of others, for instance by presenting a more positive image of themselves instead of reporting their true attitude. In this study, we investigated the role of interviewers in the measurement of happiness. We were particularly interested in whether the interviewer’s happiness correlates with the respondent’s happiness. Our data comes from a face-to-face survey conducted in Hungary, which included the attitudes of both respondents and interviewers. The results of the multilevel regression models showed that interviewers account for a significant amount of variance in responses obtained from respondents, even after controlling for a range of characteristics of both respondents, interviewers, and settlements. We also found that respondents were more likely to report a happy personality in the presence of an interviewer with a happy personality. We argue that as long as interviewers are involved in the collection of SWB measures, further training of interviewers on raising awareness on personality traits, self-expression, neutrality, and unjustified positive confirmations is essential.
Funder
hungarian scientific research fund
Eötvös Loránd University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference73 articles.
1. Akay, A., & Martinsson, P. (2009). Sundays are blue: Aren’t they? The day-of-the-week effect on subjective well-being and socio-economic status. Working Papers in Economics, No. 397, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
2. Andersen, A.-M.N., & Olsen, J. (2002). Do interviewers’ health beliefs and habits modify responses to sensitive questions? A study using data collected from pregnant women by means of computer-assisted telephone interviews. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/155.1.95
3. Bajo, M., Stavraki, M., Blanco, A., & Díaz, D. (2020). Direct versus indirect well-being measures: Using partially structured stimuli to evaluate well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00332-7
4. Biermann, P., Bitzer, J., & Gören, E. (2019). The relationship between age and subjective well-being: Estimating within and between effects simultaneously. Oldenburg Discussion Papers in Economics.
5. Blasco-Belled, A., Rogoza, R., Torrelles-Nadal, C., & Alsinet, C. (2020). Emotional intelligence structure and its relationship with life satisfaction and happiness: New findings from the bifactor model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(6), 2031–2049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00167-x
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献