Abstract
AbstractCommunities with high levels of in-migration can experience substantial social, cultural, and economic change due to the upheaval in social dynamics and changes to the economy. Such upheaval can result in between-group inequalities amongst the native and migrant populations, with migrants tending to have lower levels of wellbeing compared to those who were born in the area. Through utilising a culturally adapted wellbeing measurement tool, the Indonesian Wellbeing Scale, this study examines the native-immigrant wellbeing gap in Papua, Indonesia. Papua has historically experienced high levels of conflict, and is highly ethnically diverse, making it a unique context to examine the native-immigrant wellbeing gap. Drawing on data collected in 2020, the results indicate that the immigrant population has significantly higher levels of wellbeing when controlling for a number of socio-demographic characteristics. This finding is driven by all wellbeing dimensions within the Indonesian Wellbeing Scale: spirituality, social relations, material needs, and self-acceptance. Possible explanations for this include the happy migrant hypothesis, levels of wellbeing pre-migration, and impacts of the migration process. These findings have important implications for migration within both Indonesia, and in similar contexts throughout the world, highlighting that care must be taken when implementing migration policies to ensure that receiving communities are not negatively affected. Furthermore, the study emphasises the value in using a multidimensional, culturally adapted wellbeing measurement tool that was developed in consultation with individuals in the community to ensure we are more closely measuring what matters to people.
Funder
Australian National University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference64 articles.
1. Ananta, A., Utami, D. R. W. W., & Handayani, N. B. (2016). Statistics on ethnic diversity in the land of Papua, Indonesia. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 3(3), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.143
2. Anderson, B. (2015). Papua's insecurity: State failure in the Indonesian periphery. East-West Center. https://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/papuas-insecurity-state-failure-in-the-indonesian-periphery.
3. Anna, Z., Yusuf, A. A., Alisjahbana, A. S., Ghina, A. A., & Rahma. (2019). Are fishermen happier? Evidence from a large-scale subjective well-being survey in a lower-middle-income country. Marine Policy, 106, 103559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103559
4. Anson, J. (2004). The migrant mortality advantage: a 70 month follow-up of the Brussels population. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne De Démographie, 20(3), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-004-0883-1
5. Antecol, H., & Bedard, K. (2006). Unhealthy assimilation: Why do immigrants converge to American health status levels? Demography, 43(2), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0011
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献