A Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Diener’s Tripartite Model of Subjective Well-Being Across 16 Countries-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Diener’s Tripartite Model of Subjective Well-Being Across 16 Countries

Published:2024-08 Issue:6 Volume:25 Page:
ISSN:1389-4978
Container-title:Journal of Happiness Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:J Happiness Stud

Author:

Jovanović Veljko^ORCID,Rudnev Maksim^ORCID,Aryanto Christ Billy,Balgiu Beatrice Adriana,Caudek Corrado,Datu Jesus Alfonso D.,Guse Tharina,Kyriazos Theodoros,Lambert Louise,Mishra Krishna Kumar,Puente-Díaz Rogelio,Rice Sean P. M.,Singh Kamlesh,Sumi Katsunori,Tong Kwok Kit,Yaaqeib Saad,Yıldırım Murat,Zager Kocjan Gaja,Żemojtel-Piotrowska Magdalena

Funder

National Science Centre

Slovenian Research Agency

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10902-024-00781-4.pdf

Reference92 articles.

1. Albuquerque, I., de Lima, M. P., Figueiredo, C., & Matos, M. (2012). Subjective well-being structure: Confirmatory factor analysis in a teachers’ Portuguese sample. Social Indicators Research, 105(3), 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9789-6

2. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. Plenum Press.

3. Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J., & Wood, J. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000226

4. Arthaud-Day, M. L., Rode, J. C., Mooney, C. H., & Near, J. P. (2005). The subjective well-being construct: A test of its convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-8209-6

5. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(3), 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204