Availability and Content Analysis of Smartphone Applications on Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Using Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS)

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review A large number of smartphone applications bring with it cluttering and distorted information. Hence, the aim of this review was to critically evaluate conservative dentistry and endodontics apps among mobile phone apps. Furthermore, the objective was to assess the quality of apps using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). Mobile applications were explored on the Apple App Store (AAS) and Google Play Store (GPS), using search terms and content analysis done using the MARS rating scale which is divided into three categories: app overall quality, app subjective quality, and app specific quality. Statistical analysis used Pearson’s correlations analyzed correlations between app scores and downloads/ratings and ANOVA, to analyze any differences between app focus and mean scores. Recent Findings Overall MARS scores ranged from 2 to 4.68 with a mean (SD) of 3.40 (0.79). The highest mean score in engagement (4.8/5) and highest esthetic mean score (4.6/5) were noted with an app named “Denticalc.” The highest functionality score (4.88/5) and information domain (4.7/5) belonged to the “AAE Endocase” app. A positive correlation was seen among average user rating score with app subjective mean score and overall mean scores. Summary To improve the overall quality of apps, developers must take into account both engaging and necessary features with high-quality, evidence-based information. Graphical Abstract