Abstract
AbstractAdditive manufacturing enables the production of lighter, more robust components with intricate features like lattice structures. However, since the mechanical behaviour of lattice structures is not fully characterized, the application of such potential is limited today. The challenge with lattice structures tensile tests is defining a suitable design that fits the standard requirements and process characteristics. In the polymeric powder bed fusion process, the problem is to produce powder-free geometries and to avoid stress concentrations zones, adapting the specimen accordingly. In this regard, numerical simulation may provide insightful information and support the analysis of the deformation mechanisms. This paper analyses a new tensile sample for lattice structures using finite element analysis. The sample is designed following the EN ISO 527 standard prescriptions. An area with a controlled gradation of the lattice relative density is designed to ensure both powder-free voids and fracture localization within the lattice specimen gauge length. Experimental tests are performed to validate the numerical results using a modified body cubic centred topology with two different strut diameters. The specimens are produced in polyamide by powder bed AM process. Due to the complexity of the lattice design, a digital image correlation is used to compute the full range of strains at the macroscopic level. Experimental and numerical strain maps results showed a good agreement. The recorded deviation was attributed to the process-induced defect, such as the geometrical accuracy that, if compensated, boosted the capability of the numerical model to predict the mechanical behaviour of the lattice structure.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Murchio S, Dallago M, Zanini F, Carmignato S, Zappini G, Berto F, Benedetti M (2021) Additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V thin struts via laser powder bed fusion: effect of building orientation on geometrical accuracy and mechanical properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104495
2. Sombatmai A, Uthaisangsuk V, Wongwises S, Promoppatum P (2021) Multiscale investigation of the influence of geometrical imperfections, porosity, and size-dependent features on mechanical behavior of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V lattice struts. Mater Des 209:109985. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2021.109985
3. Hossain U, Ghouse S, Nai K, Jeffers JRT (2021) Mechanical and morphological properties of additively manufactured SS316L and Ti6Al4V micro-struts as a function of build angle. Addit Manuf 46:102050. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2021.102050
4. Pavan M, Craeghs T, Verhelst R, Ducatteeuw O, Kruth JP, Dewulf W (2016) CT-based quality control of laser sintering of polymers. Case Stud Nondestr Test Eval. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csndt.2016.04.004
5. Neff C, Hopkinson N, Crane NB (2020) Selective laser sintering of diamond lattice structures: experimental results and FEA model comparison. In: Proceedings—26th annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium—an additive manufacturing conference, SFF 2015