Newton vs. Euler–Lagrange approach, or how and when beam equations are variational

Abstract

AbstractThere is a clear and compelling need to correctly write the equations of motion of structures in order to adequately describe their dynamics. Two routes, indeed very different from a philosophical standpoint, can be used in classical mechanics to derive such equations, namely the Newton vectorial approach (i.e., roughly, sum of forces equal to mass times acceleration) or the Euler–Lagrange variational formulation (i.e., roughly, stationarity of a certain functional). However, it is desirable that whichever derivation strategy is chosen, the equations are the same. Since many structures of interest often consist of slender and highly flexible beams operating in regimes of large displacement and large rotation, we restrict our attention to the Euler-Bernoulli assumptions with a generic initial configuration. In this setting, the question that arises is: What conditions must the constitutive assumptions satisfy in order for the equations of motion obtained by Newton’s approach to be identical to the Euler–Lagrange equations derived from an appropriate Lagrangian, natural or virtual, for any arbitrary initial configuration? The aim of this paper is to try to answer this basic question, which indeed does not have an immediate and simple answer, in particular as a consequence of the fact that bending moment could be related to two different notions of flexural curvature.