Marrow stimulation procedures for high‐grade cartilage lesions during surgical repair of medial meniscus root tear yielded suboptimal outcomes, whilst small lesions showed surgical eligibility

Author:

Moon Hyun‐Soo12,Jung Min13,Choi Chong‐Hyuk13,Yoo Je‐Hyun12,Nam Bum‐Joon14,Lee Seung‐Hun2,Shin Seung‐Hwan3,Kim Dong‐Ki3,Kim Sung‐Hwan14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea

2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital Hallym University College of Medicine Anyang Republic of Korea

3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery Severance Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea

4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery Gangnam Severance Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo investigate the surgical outcomes of arthroscopic pull‐out repair for medial meniscus root tear (MMRT) combined with the marrow stimulation procedures (MSP) for accompanying high‐grade cartilage lesions.MethodsPatients who underwent arthroscopic pull‐out repair for MMRT between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had at least 3 years of follow‐up were included and classified into two groups according to whether MSP (microfracture or microdrilling) were performed on cartilage lesions in the medial tibiofemoral joint (group 1, patients with International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grade 0–3a lesions and did not undergo MSP; group 2, patients with ICRS grade 3b–3d lesions and underwent MSP). Comparative analyses, including non‐inferiority trials, were conducted between groups for subjective and objective outcomes. In addition, group 2 was further divided into two subgroups according to cartilage lesion size and compared with group 1 (group S, ≤ 2.0 cm2; group L, > 2.0 cm2).ResultsA total of 94 patients were included (group 1, 68 patients; group 2, 26 patients). There were no significant differences in clinical scores at postoperative 3 years and final follow‐up between groups 1 and 2, but group 2 failed to satisfy the non‐inferiority criteria compared to group 1 overall. In objective outcomes, group 2 did not meet the non‐inferiority criteria for the rate of osteoarthritis progression compared to group 1, and it also showed a significantly higher proportion of high‐grade osteoarthritis at final follow‐up (P = 0.044) and a higher degree of osteoarthritis progression than group 1 (P = 0.03 for pre‐ to postoperative 3 years, and P = 0.006 for pre‐ to final follow‐up). In additional evaluations comparing the subgroups of group 2 and group 1, group S showed relatively favourable results compared to group L in objective outcomes at final follow‐up.ConclusionPatients who underwent arthroscopic pull‐out repair for MMRT combined with MSP for accompanying high‐grade cartilage lesions showed suboptimal outcomes compared to those with no or low‐grade lesions at mid‐term follow‐up. High‐grade cartilage lesions ≤ 2.0 cm2 may be candidates for the surgical repair of MMRT if MSP are performed, but those with larger lesions may require alternative treatment strategies.Level of evidenceIII.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3