PCL retained is safe in medial pivot TKA—a prospective randomized trial

Abstract

AbstractPurposeMedial pivot (MP) designs resemble native knee kinematics and restore the “natural” kinematics of a knee after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, whether to preserve or resect the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is still under debate. We inquired whether sacrificing the PCL would improve range of motion, functional outcomes, and limb alignment compared to preserving the PCL in TKA using medial pivot implants (MP‐TKA).MethodsThis prospective, double‐blinded, randomized controlled trial consisted of 33 patients (66 knees) undergoing bilateral simultaneous MP‐TKA. In one knee, a PCL preservation technique was performed, and in the contralateral knee, the PCL was resected. The primary outcome was postoperative range of motion (ROM). The secondary outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) score for knee pain at walking, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for symptoms (KOOS‐S) and quality of life (KOOS‐QoL), Oxford knee score (OKS), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and measurement of the mechanical femoral‐tibial axis (mFTA) on X‐ray images. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years after surgery.ResultsPatients who underwent MP‐TKA with PCL preservation had a similar ROM at 2 years (125.45 ± 7.00 vs. 126.21 ± 6.73, p = 0.65) as those who underwent MP‐TKAs with PCL resection. There was also no difference in VAS score (1.94 ± 0.79 vs. 2.00 ± 0.71, respectively, p = 0.51), OKS (39.97 ± 2.01 vs. 39.67 ± 2.03, respectively, p = 0.52), KOOS‐S (84.41 ± 3.77 vs. 84.19 ± 3.57, respectively, p = 0.92), KOOS‐QoL (82.94 ± 4.76 vs. 82.75 ± 4.70, respectively, p = 0.84), or FJS (72.66 ± 8.99 vs. 72.35 ± 8.64, respectively, p = 0.76) at the 2‐year follow‐up. No difference in the measurement of the mFTA was found between the two groups (180.27 ± 2.25 vs. 181.30 ± 2.13, respectively, p = 0.59).ConclusionThis study demonstrated that both medial pivot TKA with PCL preservation and PCL resection achieved excellent results. There was no difference at the 2‐year follow‐up in terms of postoperative ROM, patient‐reported outcomes, or radiographic evaluation.Level of EvidenceTherapeutic study, Level I.