Satisfactory patient‐reported outcomes in patients treated with impaction bone grafting and autologous matrix‐induced chondrogenesis for osteochondral knee defects

Abstract

AbstractPurposeOsteochondral knee defects usually affect young, active patients and may alter knee biomechanics and progressively lead to joint degeneration. Various treatment options exist with autologous, impaction bone grafting in combination with autologous matrix‐induced chondrogenesis (BG‐AMIC) being a less‐expensive, one‐step, promising option. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological mid‐term outcomes of large osteochondral lesions treated with BG‐AMIC, identify a possible correlation between the two and report postoperative complications and reoperation rate.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 25 patients treated with the BG‐AMIC technique for knee osteochondral lesions was performed. Patients were assessed using the following PROMs: the IKDC, the KOOS and the Lysholm score, the Tegner activity scale and a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). The EQ‐5D‐5L score was used to assess health‐related quality of life. Radiological assessment was performed using the MOCART 2.0 score on a 3 T MRI.ResultsAt a mean of 3.8 (± 0.8)‐year follow‐up, all functional scores increased significantly (p < 0.005) when compared to the preoperative baseline. IKDC increased from 44.5 (± 15.9) to 81.4 (± 14.7), KOOS from 41.5 (± 16.1) to 91.6 (± 11.6) and Lysholm from 54.4 (± 23) to 95.2 (± 5.5) (p < 0.005). The EQ‐5D‐5L score also revealed a significant improvement [59.9 (± 25) to 93.4 (± 10.2), p < 0.005]. Mean Tegner score reached pre‐injury levels. The PASS was positive in 100% of patients. The minimum clinically important difference was reached in all PROMs except for the KOOS Sports subscale. There were no re‐operations. Morphological evaluation of the repair tissue using the MOCART 2.0 score revealed a mean total score of 52.8 (± 30.5). A statistically significant, positive correlation was found between the MOCART 2.0 score and the IKDC score, the KOOS ADL subscale and the EQ‐5D‐5L (p < 0.05).ConclusionBG‐AMIC is a safe and reliable option for treating deep, knee osteochondral lesions, providing a statistically significant and clinically important improvement in patient‐reported outcomes. No complications were noticed, and no re‐operations were performed after the procedure. A moderate positive correlation between the MOCART 2.0 score and the IKDC, KOOS ADL and EQ‐5D‐5L was noticed. However, this correlation is not necessarily clinically relevant, and excellent clinical results can be expected even in patients with low MOCART scores.Level of evidenceIII.