Robotic‐arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with comparable functional outcomes but improved forgotten joint scores compared with conventional manual total knee arthroplasty at five‐year follow‐up

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThis study reports the five‐year functional outcomes from a prospective cohort study comparing robotic‐arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RO TKA) versus conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (CO TKA).MethodsThis prospective single‐surgeon study included 120 patients with symptomatic end‐stage knee arthritis undergoing primary TKA. This included 60 consecutive patients undergoing CO TKA followed by 60 consecutive patients undergoing RO TKA using a semi‐automated robotic device. Study patients were reviewed at one, two, and five years after surgery and the following outcomes recorded: The University of California at Los Angeles activity‐level (UCLA), Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and any complications.ResultsThere were no statistical differences between RO TKA and CO TKA in the median UCLA score (p = N.S), median KSS (p = N.S), and median OKS (p = N.S) at five‐year follow‐up. RO‐TKA was associated with statistically significant improvements in the FJS at one (p = 0.001), two (p = 0.003), and five (p = 0.025) years of follow‐up compared with CO TKA. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of knee stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia between the two treatment groups (p = N.S).ConclusionPatients in both treatment groups had excellent functional outcomes with comparable patient reported outcomes at five‐year follow‐up. RO TKA was associated with statistically significant improvements in the FJS compared with CO TKA, but these differences did not reach the minimal clinically important difference at any follow‐up interval. There was no overall difference in complications between the two treatment groups at five‐year follow‐up.Level of evidenceII (Prospective cohort study).