Similar outcomes between transtendon repair and tear completion repair techniques for partial articular‐sided supraspinatus tendon avulsion lesions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Thamrongskulsiri Napatpong1ORCID,Limskul Danaithep2,Itthipanichpong Thun2,Tanpowpong Thanathep2,Kuptniratsaikul Somsak2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn University 13 Rama IV Rd, Khwaeng Pathum Wan, Khet Pathum Wan 10330 Bangkok Thailand

2. Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThis study aimed to review studies comparing transtendon repair (TTR) with tear completion repair (TCR) techniques for partial articular‐sided supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) lesions according to postoperative patient‐reported outcomes and complications.MethodsDatabases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane, were searched for studies published between 2008 and 2022 that directly compared the postoperative patient‐reported outcomes and complications of the TTR and TCR techniques for PASTA lesions. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, while mean differences (MDs) were calculated for continuous outcomes.ResultsA total of seven studies (497 shoulders) were analysed. No statistically significant differences in the postoperative clinical outcomes at the final follow‐up were observed between the TTR and TCR techniques for PASTA lesions. The overall retear rates of the TTR and TCR techniques were 7.7% and 11.6%, respectively (corresponding healing rates were 92.3% and 88.4%), whereas the overall occurrence rates of adhesive capsulitis were 4.7% and 3.3%, respectively. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in postoperative range of motion (forward flexion, MD = − 1.22, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) − 5.28 to 3.34, n.s.; external rotation, MD = − 1.39, 95% CI − 3.19 to 0.42, n.s.), overall retear rate (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.29–1.08, n.s.), and occurrence rate of adhesive capsulitis (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.35–3.52, n.s.) between the two techniques.ConclusionBoth techniques improve clinical outcomes while having a low complication rate and a high rate of healing. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed between the two techniques.Level of evidenceIII.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3