Increased TT–TG distance caused by excessive tibiofemoral rotation predicts poor clinical outcomes after tibial tubercle osteotomy in recurrent patellar dislocation

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo compare clinical outcome between recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) with or without actual tibial tubercle lateralisation (TTL) after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL‐R) combined with tibial tubercle transfer.MethodsFrom 2015 to 2018, a total of 172 knees with RPD and a tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT–TG) distance of > 20 mm were treated with MPFL‐R combined with tibial tubercle transfer. Patients were divided into the lateralisation group (TT–PCL > 24 mm, n = 74) and the nonlateralisation group (TT–PCL ≤ 24 mm, n = 60) based on the presence or absence of actual TTL (TT–PCL > 24 mm). Clinical outcomes were assessed postoperatively at a minimum of 2 years. Second‐look arthroscopic evaluations were available for 84 knees to assess cartilage damage.ResultsA total of 134 knees with a median follow‐up time of 32 months were included. Tibiofemoral rotation (TFR) was significantly higher in the nonlateralisation group than in the lateralisation group (15.4° vs. 9.4°, P < 0.001). At the final follow‐up, the nonlateralisation group had significantly lower Kujala (78.2 vs. 86.4, P = 0.001) and Lysholm (80.3 vs. 88.2, P = 0.003) scores than the lateralisation group. At the time of the second‐look arthroscopic assessment, 38.9% of the patients in the nonlateralisation group showed cartilage worsening in the medial patellar facet that was significantly higher than that in the lateralisation group (38.9% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.015).ConclusionPatients with RPD and an increased TT–TG distance of > 20 mm but without actual tibial tubercle lateralisation benefit less from tibial tubercle transfer than patients with actual tibial tubercle lateralisation, which may be related to the significantly higher tibiofemoral rotation angle of the former.Level of evidenceIII.