High degree of consensus achieved regarding diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability among ESA-ESSKA members

Author:

Rosso ClaudioORCID,Martetschläger FrankORCID,Saccomanno Maristella F.ORCID,Voss AndreasORCID,Lacheta LuccaORCID,Ângelo Ana Catarina,Antonogiannakis Emmanuel,Azevedo Clara,Bak Klaus,Becirbegovic Semin,Beitzel KnutORCID,Bilsel Kerem,Brzoska Roman,Calvo Angel,Charousset Christophe,Dyrna Felix,Brilakis Emmanuel,Franceschi Francesco,Glasson Jean Marc,Gleyze Pascal,Gomes Nuno,Hackney Roger,Hantes Michael,Karargyris Orestis,Karahan Mustafa,Kovacic Ladislav,Kubashev Alexander,Lacheta LuccaORCID,Lorbach Olaf,Maben Benjo,Marjanovic Benjamin,Martetschlaeger Frank,Yiannakopolus Christos,Ostermann Roman C,Panagopoulos Andreas,Papadopoulos Perikles,Poberaj Boris,Rosso ClaudioORCID,Saccomanno Maristella Francesca,Smolen Daniel,Soler Francesc,Taverna Ettore,Toussaint Bruno,Vavken Patrick,Voss AndreasORCID,Zurita Nestor,Beitzel KnutORCID,Milano GiuseppeORCID,

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To develop a consensus on diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability. Methods A consensus process following the modified Delphi technique was conducted. Panel members were selected among the European Shoulder Associates of ESSKA. Five rounds were performed between October 2018 and November 2019. The first round consisted of gathering questions which were then divided into blocks referring to imaging, classifications, surgical approach for acute and chronic cases, conservative treatment. Subsequent rounds consisted of condensation by means of an online questionnaire. Consensus was achieved when ≥ 66.7% of the participants agreed on one answer. Descriptive statistic was used to summarize the data. Results A consensus was reached on the following topics. Imaging: a true anteroposterior or a bilateral Zanca view are sufficient for diagnosis. 93% of the panel agreed on clinical override testing during body cross test to identify horizontal instability. The Rockwood classification, as modified by the ISAKOS statement, was deemed valid. The separation line between acute and chronic cases was set at 3 weeks. The panel agreed on arthroscopically assisted anatomic reconstruction using a suspensory device (86.2%), with no need of a biological augmentation (82.8%) in acute injuries, whereas biological reconstruction of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with tendon graft was suggested in chronic cases. Conservative approach and postoperative care were found similar Conclusion A consensus was found on the main topics of controversy in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Each step of the diagnostic treatment algorithm was fully investigated and clarified. Level of evidence Level V.

Funder

University of Basel

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3