Arthroscopic all‐inside ligament repair has similar or superior clinical outcomes compared to open repair for chronic ankle instability without concomitant intra‐articular pathology at 5 years follow‐up

Author:

Guelfi Matteo12ORCID,Baalbaki Rayan3,Malagelada Francesc4,Dalmau‐Pastor Miki56ORCID,Vega Jordi5768

Affiliation:

1. Foot and Ankle Unit Casa di Cura Villa Montallegro Genoa Italy

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery “Gruppo Policlinico Di Monza” Clinica Salus Alessandria Italy

3. Foot and Ankle Department Clinique Montchoisi Lausanne Switzerland

4. Foot and Ankle Unit The Royal London Hospital Barts Health NHS Trust London UK

5. Human Anatomy and Embryology Unit Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

6. MIFAS By GRECMIP (Minimally Invasive Foot and Ankle Society) Merignac France

7. Foot and Ankle Unit Hospital Quirón Barcelona Spain

8. iMove Traumatology Tres Torres Barcelona Spain

Abstract

AbstractPurposeOpen ligament repair is widely considered the gold standard treatment for chronic ankle instability. Nevertheless, arthroscopic treatment of ankle instability has gained popularity becoming the preferred technique for many surgeons. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of all‐inside arthroscopic versus open lateral ligament repair for chronic ankle instability at 5 years follow‐up.MethodsNinety consecutive patients were surgically treated for chronic ankle instability without concomitant intra‐articular pathology observed on MRI: 41 patients [median age 28 (range 15–54) years] underwent an open lateral ligament repair (OLR); 49 patients [median age 30 (range 19–47) years] underwent an all‐inside arthroscopic ligament repair (ALR). Functional outcomes using the Foot Functional Index (FFI), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hindfoot Score, and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure‐Sports Subscale (FAAM‐SS) were assessed preoperatively and at the latest follow‐up. At the latest follow‐up, the satisfaction rate and complications were also recorded.ResultsThe mean follow‐up was 58 ± 17.6 (range 47–81) months. In both groups FFI, AOFAS and FAAM‐SS score significantly improved compared to preoperative values (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative outcomes between groups in the AOFAS (n.s) and FAAM‐SS (n.s), but the FFI results were significantly better in the ALR group (p < 0.05). No major complications were reported in either group.ConclusionOpen and arthroscopic ligament repair to treat chronic ankle instability without concomitant intra‐articular pathology produced excellent comparable clinical outcomes at 5 years follow‐up. The complications were minimal in both study groups with no significant differences in AOFAS and FAAM‐SS scores. However, arthroscopic repair showed significantly better results on the FFI. Therefore, when treating chronic lateral ankle instability, surgeons should consider arthroscopic ligament repair.Level of evidenceIII.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Reference41 articles.

1. ArthroBroström Lateral Ankle Stabilization Technique

2. Arthroscopic repair of lateral ankle ligament for chronic lateral ankle instability: a systematic review;Brown AJ;Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2018

3. Broström Repair With and Without Augmentation: Comparison of Outcomes at Median Follow-up of 5 Years

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3