Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio—“best fit circle”—method even with three-dimensional computed tomography-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio—“best fit circle”—method even with three-dimensional computed tomography

Published:2019-02-06 Issue:10 Volume:27 Page:3222-3229
ISSN:0942-2056
Container-title:Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
language:en
Short-container-title:Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

Author:

Lacheta Lucca,Herbst Elmar,Voss Andreas,Braun Sepp,Jungmann Pia,Millett Peter J.,Imhoff Andreas,Martetschläger Frank^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00167-019-05391-9/fulltext.html

Reference26 articles.

1. Bishop JY, Jones GL, Rerko MA, Donaldson C, Group MS (2013) 3-D CT is the most reliable imaging modality when quantifying glenoid bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:1251–1256

2. Boileau P, Villalba M, Hery JY, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L (2006) Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88:1755–1763

3. Bois AJ, Fening SD, Polster J, Jones MH, Miniaci A (2012) Quantifying glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: reliability and accuracy of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional computed tomography measurement techniques. Am J Sports Med 40:2569–2577

4. Burkhart SS, De Beer JF (2000) Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill–Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 16:677–694

5. Chuang TY, Adams CR, Burkhart SS (2008) Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy 24:376–382

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Objective calculation of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability based on the contour of the posteroinferior quadrant using the best-fit circle method: an accurate and reproducible evaluation;Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery;2024-05

2. The Perfect Circle Technique Shows Poor Inter-rater Reliability in Measuring Anterior Glenoid Bone Loss on Magnetic Resonance Imaging;Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation;2024-04

3. Accuracy and Consistency of 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Comparable With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Assessing Glenohumeral Instability: A Systematic Review;Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery;2024-04

4. A formula for instability-related bone loss: estimating glenoid width and redefining bare spot;International Orthopaedics;2024-02-02

5. Glenoid Track Assessment at Imaging in Anterior Shoulder Instability: Rationale and Step-by-Step Guide;RadioGraphics;2023-08-01