Effects of incomplete sampling on macroinvertebrate secondary production estimates in a forested headwater stream

Abstract

AbstractEstimates of secondary production depend on the efficiency of sampling methods in capturing abundances and body lengths of the entire macroinvertebrate community. The efficiency of common sampling methods in fulfilling these criteria is poorly understood. We compared the effects of a Surber sampler (250 µm mesh size) and a Freeze corer in capturing abundance, biomass, and secondary production of macroinvertebrates in a forested headwater stream. We then examined how the use of nets with different mesh sizes could affect estimates of secondary production. Macroinvertebrate abundance was three times lower, and biomass was three times higher with the Surber than with the Freeze corer. Neither method captured the entire length distribution, and incomplete sampling of body lengths and abundance resulted in underestimating total secondary production by 48% (Surber) and 49% (Freeze corer). We estimated that reducing the mesh size from 250 to 100 µm would reduce the underestimation of production from ~ 48 to ~ 12% due to the inclusion of smaller individuals. Our results improve the efficiency of common sampling methods, allowing a reliable quantification of the role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem functioning.