Author:
Brinkmann Svend,Birk Rasmus,Lund Peter Clement
Abstract
AbstractThe relationship between biology and the psy disciplines (psychology, psychiatry, and psychotherapy) is a complex one. Many scholars have criticized how these disciplines have been biologized in the 20th century, especially since the emergence of psychopharmacology, neuroscience, and genetic research. However, biology is not just a laboratory-based science of chemical compounds, scanners, and DNA sequencing, but also a field science based on observations of organisms in their milieus. In this paper, we draw a contrast between laboratory-based biology with a focus on brains and genes, and an ecology-based biology with a focus on lives and niches. Our argument is philosophical in nature – building partly on Wittgenstein as a “philosopher of life” – to the effect that the psy sciences need not just less biologization of the former kind, but also more biologization of the latter kind to avoid a prevalent mentalism. Not least when it comes to an understanding of psychological distress, which can favorably be viewed situationally and coupled to human lives in ecological niches.
Funder
Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
Aalborg University Library
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Applied Psychology,Anthropology,Communication,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology
Reference64 articles.
1. Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition (This edition 1998). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of Neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Birk, R. H. (2021). On stress and subjectivity. Theory & Psychology, 31(2), 254–272.
4. Bolton, D. (2008). What is Mental Disorder? An essay in Philosophy, Science, and values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bowden, G. (2014). The merit of sociological accounts of disorder: The attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder case. Health, 18, 422–438.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献