Is Democracy Therapeutic? A Deweyan Reading of the Institutions of Antipsychiatry

Author:

Villacañas de Castro Luis S.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis article presents a Deweyan reading of the processes of critique, experimentation, and reform that took hold of a minority of psychiatric institutions in Western Europe during the nineteen-sixties and seventies, under the influence of the so-called Italian and British antipsychiatry movements. Framed within a specific understanding of the sixties, the article examines these complex theoretical and institutional operations against the background of John Dewey’s idea of democracy, which it interprets, above all else, as the constant provision of material, intellectual, and human resources for the people to directly transform their environment and themselves in increasingly complex and creative ways. After acknowledging the historical and conceptual discontinuities that exist between these two autonomous bodies of knowledge, the first section presents a summary of Dewey’s philosophy. Next the article sheds light on Basaglia’s and Laing’s antipsychiatric projects by interpreting them as a sustained effort to distinguish between schizophrenia as a first and a second disease, an epistemological search in the midst of which each of them ended up creating new institutions that necessarily embarked their inmates on a radical process of Deweyan growth. The key role of the sixties counterculture is emphasized at this point, and examples from Gorizia’s and Trieste’s asylums, as well as British community households, are read in terms of Basaglia’s and Laing’s negative and affirmative dialectics, respectively. Finally, in the last two sections, the article argues that antipsychiatry’s analysis of psychotic behavior significantly enlarges Dewey’s understanding of the circuit of growth and experience, and that Dewey’s ideas of growth and experience provided, in turn, a missing criterion for defining mental health and deriving coherent therapeutic and institutional concretions.

Funder

Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España

Universitat de Valencia

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy,Applied Psychology,Anthropology,Communication,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology

Reference74 articles.

1. Barnes, M., & Berke, J. (2002 [1971]). Mary Barnes. Two accounts of a journey through madness. Other Press.

2. Basaglia, F. (1970 [1968]). La institución de la violencia [The institution of violence]. In F. Basaglia (Ed.) La institución negada. Informe de un hospital psiquiátrico [The negated institution. Report of a psychiatric hospital] (pp. 129–172). Barral.

3. Basaglia, F., & Basaglia Ognaro, F. (1973 [1971]). La mayoría marginada [The marginated majority]. Laia.

4. Basaglia, F. (1985 [1973]). What is psychiatry? International Journal of Mental Health, 14(1–2), 42–51.

5. Basaglia, F., & Basaglia Ongaro, F. (2018 [1966]). A problem of institutional psychiatry: Exclusion as a social and psychiatric category. International Review of Psychiatry, 30(2), 120–128.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3