Abstract
AbstractIn recent decades we have seen an exponential growth in the amount of data gathered within psychological research without a corresponding growth of theory that could meaningfully organize these research findings. For this reason, considerable attention today is given to discussions of such broader, higher-order concepts as theory and paradigm. However, another area important to consider is the nature of the questions psychologists are asking. Key to any discussion about the scientific status of psychology or about progress in the field (scientific or otherwise) is the nature of the questions that inspire psychological research. Psychologists concerned about scientific progress and the growth of theory in the field would be well served by more robust conversations about the nature of the questions being asked. Honest, curiosity-driven questions—questions that admit to our ignorance and that express an active and optimistic yearning for what we do not yet know—can help to propel psychology forward in a manner similar to the development of theory or paradigm. However, existing as it does in the “twilight zone” between the natural sciences and the humanities, psychology is fertile ground for questions of wide-ranging natures, and thus the nature of progress in the field can be variously understood, not all of which will be “scientific.” Recent psychological research in three areas (cognition, memory, and disorders/differences of sex development) are discussed as examples of how curiosity-driven questions being asked from a position of informed ignorance can lead to progress in the field.
Funder
Jagiellonian University in Krakow
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Applied Psychology,Anthropology,Communication,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology
Reference43 articles.
1. Aeschliman, M. D. (1983). The restitution of man. C. S. Lewis and the case against scientism. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
2. APA, American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical Manuel of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
3. APA, American Psychological Association (2018). What’s next? We asked 33 influential psychologists to identify the critical questions the discipline must answer. Available online at https://www.apa.org/monitor/2018/07-08/cover-next
4. Bergman, M. (2009). Peirce’s philosophy of communication. The rhetorical underpinnings of the theory of signs. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
5. Boesch. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献