Progress in Psychological Science. The Importance of Informed Ignorance and Curiosity-Driven Questions

Author:

Mazur Lucas BORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn recent decades we have seen an exponential growth in the amount of data gathered within psychological research without a corresponding growth of theory that could meaningfully organize these research findings. For this reason, considerable attention today is given to discussions of such broader, higher-order concepts as theory and paradigm. However, another area important to consider is the nature of the questions psychologists are asking. Key to any discussion about the scientific status of psychology or about progress in the field (scientific or otherwise) is the nature of the questions that inspire psychological research. Psychologists concerned about scientific progress and the growth of theory in the field would be well served by more robust conversations about the nature of the questions being asked. Honest, curiosity-driven questions—questions that admit to our ignorance and that express an active and optimistic yearning for what we do not yet know—can help to propel psychology forward in a manner similar to the development of theory or paradigm. However, existing as it does in the “twilight zone” between the natural sciences and the humanities, psychology is fertile ground for questions of wide-ranging natures, and thus the nature of progress in the field can be variously understood, not all of which will be “scientific.” Recent psychological research in three areas (cognition, memory, and disorders/differences of sex development) are discussed as examples of how curiosity-driven questions being asked from a position of informed ignorance can lead to progress in the field.

Funder

Jagiellonian University in Krakow

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy,Applied Psychology,Anthropology,Communication,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology

Reference43 articles.

1. Aeschliman, M. D. (1983). The restitution of man. C. S. Lewis and the case against scientism. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

2. APA, American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical Manuel of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.

3. APA, American Psychological Association (2018). What’s next? We asked 33 influential psychologists to identify the critical questions the discipline must answer. Available online at https://www.apa.org/monitor/2018/07-08/cover-next

4. Bergman, M. (2009). Peirce’s philosophy of communication. The rhetorical underpinnings of the theory of signs. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.

5. Boesch. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3