Abstract
AbstractWerner Greve argues for an abstract and integrative theory of development; to progress toward such a theory, he suggests that evolutionary psychology can provide concepts for a processual approach to adaptation. To complement this perspective, I propose to start where the author finishes: the need to further qualify change, and to account for information. Considering ruptures and sense-making as cornerstones of a developmental approach, I recall that open dynamic approaches offer a meta-theoretical frame for an integrative developmental psychology, and that cultural approaches already and always account for meaning-making to start with. Assuming these two givens, a variety of integrative propositions account for stability and change; I present an historical example, the work of Gordon Allport, and a current one, our work as sociocultural psychologists, to show how the theoretical and heuristic interest of this proposition.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Applied Psychology,Anthropology,Communication,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology
Reference52 articles.
1. Allport, G. W. (1942). The use of personal documents in psychological science: Prepared for the Committee on Appraisal of Research. Social Science Research Council.
2. Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. Yale University Press.
3. Allport, G. W. (1960). The open system in personality theory. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61(3), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043619.
4. Allport, G. W. (1962). The general and the unique in psychological science1. Journal of Personality, 30(3), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02313.x.
5. Allport, G. W. (1963). Pattern and growth in personality (original 1937). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.