Identifying common and persistent errors made by novice analysts when modeling business processes using UML activity diagram: utilizing a hierarchical error classification-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Identifying common and persistent errors made by novice analysts when modeling business processes using UML activity diagram: utilizing a hierarchical error classification

Published:2023-05-15 Issue:4 Volume:31 Page:1149-1178
ISSN:0963-9314
Container-title:Software Quality Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Software Qual J

Author:

Beimel Dizza,Tsoury Arava,Lev Shirly Bar

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Software

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11219-023-09628-2.pdf

Reference38 articles.

1. Anda, B., Dreiem, H., Sjøberg, D. I., & Jørgensen, M. (2001). Estimating software development effort based on use cases-experiences from industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 487–502.

2. Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31(3), 597–606.

3. Batra, D., & Davis, J. G. (1992). Conceptual data modelling in database design: Similarities and differences between expert and novice designers. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 37(1), 83–101.

4. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & Von Uthmann, C. (2000). Guidelines of business process modeling. In Business process management (pp. 30–49). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

5. Beimel, D., & Kedmi-Shahar, E. (2019). Improving the identification of functional system requirements when novice analysts create use case diagrams: The benefits of applying conceptual mental models. Requirements Engineering, 24(4), 483–502.