3D-Arterial analysis software and CEUS in the assessment of severity and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a comparison with CTA and histopathology
-
Published:2022-09-17
Issue:11
Volume:127
Page:1254-1269
-
ISSN:1826-6983
-
Container-title:La radiologia medica
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Radiol med
Author:
Fresilli DanieleORCID, Di Leo Nicola, Martinelli Ombretta, Di Marzo Luca, Pacini Patrizia, Dolcetti Vincenzo, Del Gaudio Giovanni, Canni Fabrizio, Ricci Ludovica Isabella, De Vito Corrado, Caiazzo Corrado, Carletti Raffaella, Di Gioia Cira, Carbone Iacopo, Feinstein Steven B., Catalano Carlo, Cantisani Vito
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Our purpose is to assess Multiparametric Ultrasound (MPUS) efficacy for evaluation of carotid plaque vulnerability and carotid stenosis degree in comparison with Computed Tomography angiography (CTA) and histology.
Material and methods
3D-Arterial Analysis is a 3D ultrasound software that automatically provides the degree of carotid stenosis and a colorimetric map of carotid plaque vulnerability.
We enrolled 106 patients who were candidates for carotid endarterectomy. Prior to undergoing surgery, all carotid artery plaques were evaluated with Color-Doppler-US (CDUS), Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS), and 3D Arterial analysis (3DAA) US along with Computerized Tomographic Angiography (CTA) to assess the carotid artery stenosis degree. Post-surgery, the carotid specimens were fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin solution, embedded in paraffin and used for light microscopic examination to assess plaque vulnerability morphological features.
Results
The results of the CTA examinations revealed 91 patients with severe carotid stenoses with a resultant diagnostic accuracy of 82.3% for CDUS, 94.5% for CEUS, 98.4% for 3DAA, respectively. The histopathological examination showed 71 vulnerable plaques with diagnostic accuracy values of 85.8% for CDUS, 93.4% for CEUS, 90.3% for 3DAA, 92% for CTA, respectively.
Conclusions
The combination of CEUS and 3D Arterial Analysis may provide a powerful new clinical tool to identify and stratify “at-risk” patients with atherosclerotic carotid artery disease, identifying vulnerable plaques. These applications may also help in the postoperative assessment of treatment options to manage cardiovascular risks.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference72 articles.
1. Wilkins E, Wilson L, Wickramasinghe K, Bhatnagar P, Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Burns R, Rayner M, Townsend N (2017) European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017. European Heart Network, Brussels 2. Messas E, Goudot G, Halliday A, Sitruk J, Mirault T, Khider L, Saldmann F, Mazzolai L, Aboyans V (2020) Management of carotid stenosis for primary and secondary prevention of stroke: state-of-the-art 2020: a critical review. Eur Heart J Suppl 22:M35–M42 (Suppl M) 3. Muller JE, Tofler GH, Stone PH (1989) Circadian variation and triggers of onset of acute cardiovascular disease. Circulation 79(4):733–743. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.79.4.733 (PMID: 2647318) 4. Fabiani I, Palombo C, Caramella D, Nilsson J, De Caterina R (2020) Imaging of the vulnerable carotid plaque: Role of imaging techniques and a research agenda. Neurology. 94(21):922–932. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009480 5. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, Fayad Z, Stone PH, Waxman S, Raggi P, Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Burke A, Yuan C, Fitzgerald PJ, Siscovick DS, de Korte CL, Aikawa M, Juhani Airaksinen KE, Assmann G, Becker CR, Chesebro JH, Farb A, Galis ZS, Jackson C, Jang IK, Koenig W, Lodder RA, March K, Demirovic J, Navab M, Priori SG, Rekhter MD, Bahr R, Grundy SM, Mehran R, Colombo A, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne C, Insull W Jr, Schwartz RS, Vogel R, Serruys PW, Hansson GK, Faxon DP, Kaul S, Drexler H, Greenland P, Muller JE, Virmani R, Ridker PM, Zipes DP, Shah PK, Willerson JT (2003) From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation 108(14):1664–1672. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97 (PMID: 14530185)
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|