Multi-omics staging of locally advanced rectal cancer predicts treatment response: a pilot study
-
Published:2024-03-27
Issue:5
Volume:129
Page:712-726
-
ISSN:1826-6983
-
Container-title:La radiologia medica
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Radiol med
Author:
Cicalini Ilaria, Chiarelli Antonio Maria, Chiacchiaretta PieroORCID, Perpetuini David, Rosa Consuelo, Mastrodicasa Domenico, d’Annibale Martina, Trebeschi Stefano, Serafini Francesco Lorenzo, Cocco Giulio, Narciso Marco, Corvino Antonio, Cinalli Sebastiano, Genovesi Domenico, Lanuti Paola, Valentinuzzi Silvia, Pieragostino Damiana, Brocco Davide, Beets-Tan Regina G. H., Tinari Nicola, Sensi Stefano L., Stuppia Liborio, Del Boccio Piero, Caulo Massimo, Delli Pizzi Andrea
Abstract
AbstractTreatment response assessment of rectal cancer patients is a critical component of personalized cancer care and it allows to identify suitable candidates for organ-preserving strategies. This pilot study employed a novel multi-omics approach combining MRI-based radiomic features and untargeted metabolomics to infer treatment response at staging. The metabolic signature highlighted how tumor cell viability is predictively down-regulated, while the response to oxidative stress was up-regulated in responder patients, showing significantly reduced oxoproline values at baseline compared to non-responder patients (p-value < 10–4). Tumors with a high degree of texture homogeneity, as assessed by radiomics, were more likely to achieve a major pathological response (p-value < 10–3). A machine learning classifier was implemented to summarize the multi-omics information and discriminate responders and non-responders. Combining all available radiomic and metabolomic features, the classifier delivered an AUC of 0.864 (± 0.083, p-value < 10–3) with a best-point sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 81.8%. Our results suggest that a multi-omics approach, integrating radiomics and metabolomic data, can enhance the predictive value of standard MRI and could help to avoid unnecessary surgical treatments and their associated long-term complications.
Funder
Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio Chieti Pescara
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Araghi M, Soerjomataram I, Jenkins M, Brierley J, Morris E, Bray F, Arnold M (2019) Global trends in colorectal cancer mortality: projections to the year 2035. Int J Cancer 144(12):2992–3000. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32055 2. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W, Sabbaga J, Ribeiro U Jr, Silva e Sousa AH Jr, Campos FG, Kiss DR, Gama-Rodrigues J (2004) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 240(4):711–717. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000141194.27992.32. (discussion 717–718) 3. van der Valk MJM, Hilling DE, Bastiaannet E, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Beets GL, Figueiredo NL, Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Renehan AG, van de Velde CJH, Consortium I (2018) Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study. Lancet 391(10139):2537–2545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31078-X 4. Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Bipat S, Barbaro B, Curvo-Semedo L, Fenlon HM, Gollub MJ, Gourtsoyianni S, Halligan S, Hoeffel C, Kim SH, Laghi A, Maier A, Rafaelsen SR, Stoker J, Taylor SA, Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L (2018) Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 28(4):1465–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5026-2 5. Jayaprakasam VS, Alvarez J, Omer DM, Gollub MJ, Smith JJ, Petkovska I (2023) Watch-and-wait approach to rectal cancer: the role of imaging. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.221529
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|