Author:
Deandrea Silvia,Cavazzana Laura,Principi Niccolò,Luconi Ester,Campoleoni Mauro,Bastiampillai Anan Judina,Bracchi Lucia,Bucchi Lauro,Pedilarco Stella,Piscitelli Antonio,Sfondrini Maria Silvia,Silvestri Anna Rita,Castaldi Silvana
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Women with aesthetic prostheses must be included in the target population of mammography screening programmes. Breast implants are radiopaque and partially obscure the breast tissue. This can be avoided with the use of the Eklund technique, which causes an increased radiation exposure. In this study, augmented women undergoing a dedicated protocol within a population-based screening programme were compared according to selected indicators with the standard screening population. Essential dosimetric parameters and their time trend were also assessed.
Materials and methods
The study was conducted in a screening centre in Milan in the years 2009–2016. The screening protocol for women with breast implants included a double-read mammography with the Eklund views, ultrasound and clinical breast examination.
Results
A total of 28,794 women were enrolled, including 588 (2%) women with breast implants and 28,206 (98%) undergoing the standard screening protocol. The invasive assessment rate was 9.0‰ for women with breast implants vs. 15‰ in the standard cohort. The surgical referral rate was 2.2% vs. 0.9%. The detection rate was similar in the two groups (4.0 and 4.5‰, respectively). There were significant differences in the average glandular dose according to the mammography equipment. The use of the Eklund views increased over time.
Conclusions
Screening of augmented women according to a specific protocol in the contexts of population-based programmes is feasible. Observed differences in screening indicators relative to the standard screening population require further research. The increasing use of Eklund views probably results from quality assurance measures associated with screening programmes.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Milano
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference38 articles.
1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health (2011) FDA update on the safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants. U.S. food and drug administration center for devices and radiological health, Silver Spring MD
2. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2017) Cosmetic surgery national data bank statistics. Aesthet Surg J 37:1–29
3. International Society For Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2018) International survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2017. International society for aesthetic plastic surgery, Hanover
4. Hoshaw SJ, Klein PJ, Clark BD et al (2001) Breast implants and cancer: causation, delayed detection, and survival. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1393–1407
5. Tuli R, Flynn RA, Brill KL et al (2006) Diagnosis, treatment, and management of breast cancer in previously augmented women. Breast J 12:343–348
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献