Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme

Author:

Deandrea Silvia,Cavazzana Laura,Principi Niccolò,Luconi Ester,Campoleoni Mauro,Bastiampillai Anan Judina,Bracchi Lucia,Bucchi Lauro,Pedilarco Stella,Piscitelli Antonio,Sfondrini Maria Silvia,Silvestri Anna Rita,Castaldi Silvana

Abstract

Abstract Background Women with aesthetic prostheses must be included in the target population of mammography screening programmes. Breast implants are radiopaque and partially obscure the breast tissue. This can be avoided with the use of the Eklund technique, which causes an increased radiation exposure. In this study, augmented women undergoing a dedicated protocol within a population-based screening programme were compared according to selected indicators with the standard screening population. Essential dosimetric parameters and their time trend were also assessed. Materials and methods The study was conducted in a screening centre in Milan in the years 2009–2016. The screening protocol for women with breast implants included a double-read mammography with the Eklund views, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. Results A total of 28,794 women were enrolled, including 588 (2%) women with breast implants and 28,206 (98%) undergoing the standard screening protocol. The invasive assessment rate was 9.0‰ for women with breast implants vs. 15‰ in the standard cohort. The surgical referral rate was 2.2% vs. 0.9%. The detection rate was similar in the two groups (4.0 and 4.5‰, respectively). There were significant differences in the average glandular dose according to the mammography equipment. The use of the Eklund views increased over time. Conclusions Screening of augmented women according to a specific protocol in the contexts of population-based programmes is feasible. Observed differences in screening indicators relative to the standard screening population require further research. The increasing use of Eklund views probably results from quality assurance measures associated with screening programmes.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Milano

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health (2011) FDA update on the safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants. U.S. food and drug administration center for devices and radiological health, Silver Spring MD

2. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2017) Cosmetic surgery national data bank statistics. Aesthet Surg J 37:1–29

3. International Society For Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2018) International survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2017. International society for aesthetic plastic surgery, Hanover

4. Hoshaw SJ, Klein PJ, Clark BD et al (2001) Breast implants and cancer: causation, delayed detection, and survival. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1393–1407

5. Tuli R, Flynn RA, Brill KL et al (2006) Diagnosis, treatment, and management of breast cancer in previously augmented women. Breast J 12:343–348

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3