Author:
Wach Noah L.,Rudolph Manuel S.,Jendrzejewski Fred,Schmitt Sebastian
Abstract
AbstractQuantum two-level systems, i.e., qubits, form the basis for most quantum machine learning approaches that have been proposed throughout the years. However, higher dimensional quantum systems constitute a promising alternative and are increasingly explored in theory and practice. Here, we explore the capabilities of multi-level quantum systems, so-called qudits, for their use in a quantum machine learning context. We formulate classification and regression problems with the data re-uploading approach and demonstrate that a quantum circuit operating on a single qudit is able to successfully learn highly non-linear decision boundaries of classification problems such as the MNIST digit recognition problem. We demonstrate that the performance strongly depends on the relation between the qudit states representing the labels and the structure of labels in the training data set. Such a bias can lead to substantial performance improvement over qubit-based circuits in cases where the labels, the qudit states, and the operators employed to encode the data are well-aligned. Furthermore, we elucidate the influence of the choice of the elementary operators and show that a squeezing operator is necessary to achieve good performances. We also show that there exists a trade-off for qudit systems between the number of circuit-generating operators in each processing layer and the total number of layers needed to achieve a given accuracy. Finally, we compare classification results from numerically exact simulations and their equivalent implementation on actual IBM quantum hardware. The findings of our work support the notion that qudit-based algorithms exhibit attractive traits and constitute a promising route to increasing the computational capabilities of quantum machine learning approaches.
Funder
HORIZON EUROPE Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Artificial Intelligence,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Theoretical Computer Science,Software
Reference48 articles.
1. Barnett SM, Croke S (2009) Quantum state discrimination. Adv Opt Photon 1(2):238. https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.1.000238
2. Bharti K, Cervera-Lierta A, Kyaw TH, et al. (2022) Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms. Rev Mod Phys 94(1):015,004. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.015004
3. Biamonte J, Wittek P, Pancotti N et al (2017) Quantum machine learning. Nat 549(7671):195–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23474
4. Bradbury J, Frostig R, Hawkins P, et al. (2018) JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs. http://github.com/google/jax
5. Bravyi S, Kliesch A, Koenig R, et al. (2022) Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms for approximate graph coloring. Quantum 6:678. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-03-30-678
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Gell-Mann feature map of qutrits and its applications in classification tasks;Quantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation IV;2024-03-13
2. Qudit machine learning;Machine Learning: Science and Technology;2024-03-01