Abstract
AbstractQuantum kernel methods are a promising method in quantum machine learning thanks to the guarantees connected to them. Their accessibility for analytic considerations also opens up the possibility of prescreening datasets based on their potential for a quantum advantage. To do so, earlier works developed the geometric difference, which can be understood as a closeness measure between two kernel-based machine learning approaches, most importantly between a quantum kernel and a classical kernel. This metric links the quantum and classical model complexities, and it was developed to bound generalization error. Therefore, it raises the question of how this metric behaves in an empirical setting. In this work, we investigate the effects of hyperparameter choice on the model performance and the generalization gap between classical and quantum kernels. The importance of hyperparameters is well known also for classical machine learning. Of special interest are hyperparameters associated with the quantum Hamiltonian evolution feature map, as well as the number of qubits to trace out before computing a projected quantum kernel. We conduct a thorough investigation of the hyperparameters across 11 datasets, and we identify certain aspects that can be exploited. Analyzing the effects of certain hyperparameter settings on the empirical performance, as measured by cross validation accuracy, and generalization ability, as measured by geometric difference described above, brings us one step closer to understanding the potential of quantum kernel methods on classical datasets.
Funder
Fraunhofer-Institut für Kognitive Systeme IKS
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Abbas A, Sutter D, Zoufal C, Lucchi A, Figalli A, Woerner S (2021) The power of quantum neural networks. Nature Comput Sci 1(6):403–409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-021-00084-1
2. Bischl B, Casalicchio G, Feurer M, Gijsbers P, Hutter F, Lang M, Mantovani RG, Rijn JN, Vanschoren J (2021) OpenML Benchmarking Suites
3. Canatar A, Peters E, Pehlevan C, Wild SM, Shaydulin R (2023) Bandwidth enables generalization in quantum kernel models
4. Coyle B, Mills D, Danos V, Kashefi E (2020) The born supremacy: quantum advantage and training of an Ising born machine. npj Quantum Inf 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-020-00288-9
5. Daniely A, Frostig R, Singer Y (2017) Toward deeper understanding of neural networks: the power of initialization and a dual view on expressivity
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献