Author:
Neves Luiza M.,Pinto Márcia,Zin Olivia A.,Cunha Daniela P.,Agonigi Bruna N. S.,Motta Fabiana L.,Gomes Leonardo H. F.,Horovitz Dafne D. G.,Almeida Daltro C.,Malacarne Jocieli,Guida Leticia,Braga Andressa,Carvalho Adriana Bastos,Pereira Eduardo,Rodrigues Ana Paula S.,Sallum Juliana M. F.,Zin Andrea A.,Vasconcelos Zilton F. M.
Abstract
AbstractUp to 25% of pediatric cataract cases are inherited. There is sparse information in the literature regarding the cost of whole-exome sequencing (WES) for suspected hereditary pediatric cataracts. Molecular diagnosis of suspected hereditary pediatric cataracts is important for comprehensive genetic counseling. We performed a partial economic evaluation with a mixed costing analysis, using reimbursement data and microcosting approach with a bottom-up technique to estimate the cost of using WES for genetic diagnosis of suspected hereditary pediatric cataracts from the perspective of the Brazilian governmental health care system. One hundred and ten participants from twenty-nine families in Rio de Janeiro (RJ) were included. Costs of consumables, staff and equipment were calculated. Two scenarios were created: (1) The reference scenario included patients from RJ with suspected hereditary pediatric cataracts plus two family members. (2) The alternative scenario considered other genetic diseases, resulting in 5,280 exams per month. Sensitivity analysis was also performed. In the reference scenario, the total cost per exam was 700.09 United States dollars (USD), and in the alternative scenario, the total cost was 559.23 USD. The cost of WES alone was 527.85 USD in the reference scenario and 386.98 USD in the alternative scenario. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the largest costs were associated with consumables in both scenarios. Economic evaluations can help inform policy decisions, especially in middle-income countries such as Brazil.
Funder
Brazilian National Program of Support to the Health Assistance of the Person with Deficiency
Foundation for the scientific and technological development in health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Hejtmancik JF (2008) Congenital cataracts and their molecular genetics. Semin Cell Dev Biol Apr 19(2):134–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.10.003Epub 2007 Oct 10. PMID: 18035564; PMCID: PMC2288487
2. Wu X, Long E, Lin H, Liu Y (2016) Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of congenital cataract: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 6:28564. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28564PMID: 27334676; PMCID: PMC4917826
3. Patricia Zanotelli Cagliari JCS Tiago Neves Veras, Carolina Elisa Froldi Vieira, Leticia Janice Bertelli, Mariana ChammaRamo. Alterações detectadas pelo teste do reflexo vermelhoocular findings by using red-reflex testing. Arq Catarin Med 2016 45(3):48–57
4. Kong L, Fry M, Al-Samarraie M, Gilbert C, Steinkuller PG (2012) An update on progress and the changing epidemiology of causes of childhood blindness worldwide. J AAPOS. ;16(6):501-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.09.004. PMID: 23237744
5. Verzoni DS, Zin AA, Barbosa ADM (2017) Causes of visual impairment and blindness in children at Instituto Benjamin Constant Blind School, Rio De Janeiro. Revista Brasileira De Oftalmologia. ;76(3)