Parental perspectives regarding the return of genomic research results in neurodevelopmental disorders in South Africa: anticipated impact and preferences

Author:

Diedericks AngeliqueORCID,Bruwer ZandréORCID,Laing NakitaORCID,Eastman EmmaORCID,De Vries JantinaORCID,Newton Charles R.ORCID,Abubakar Amina,Robinson Elise B.,Donald Kirsten A.ORCID,

Abstract

AbstractFew policies and little research exist regarding the disclosure of genomic results to research participants in Africa. As understanding participant preferences would be pivotal to the success of the feedback process, this study set out to address this issue by engaging with enrolled participants from an ongoing genomics research project on neurodevelopmental disorders with the aim to assess the anticipated impact of receiving pertinent results and explore the preferences for feedback in a South African context. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 parents of children participating in the research study. Transcribed interview data and observational notes were analysed using thematic analysis and framework matrices. Participants linked their own meaning to the impact of receiving a pertinent result and perceived the information as useful for reasons other than only clinical utility. These included closure, improved management of their child’s condition and information regarding recurrence risks. In terms of preferences for feedback, an in-person result delivery session, conducted by a member of the study team or medical professional familiar with their child was preferred. In addition, participants felt a sense of ownership over their blood or their contribution to the research study, finding meaning even in non-pertinent results. These findings provide insight into the type of discussions that may be valuable in enabling the development of best practices and guidelines for the return of individual genetic research results, in a culturally appropriate manner, within South African communities.

Funder

IFGENERA H3Africa ELSI Collaborative Centre grant , awarded by the National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health

Stanley Centre for Psychiatric research at the Broad Institute and the National Institute of Mental Health

National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institute of Health

University of Cape Town

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference37 articles.

1. African Academy of Sciences (2021) A framework for the implementation of genomic medicine for public health in Africa. AAS Open Res 2020:1–87

2. Allen NL, Karlson EW, Malspeis S et al (2014) Biobank participants’ preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity Project. Mayo Clin Proc 89(6):738–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.03.015

3. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition, American Psychiatric Association

4. Broady TR, Stoyles GJ, Morse C (2017) Understanding carers’ lived experience of stigma: the voice of families with a child on the autism spectrum. Health Soc Care Community 25:224–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12297

5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (2018) Tri-Council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans. https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/tcps2-eptc2_2022_introducing-presentation.htmltement. Accessed 1 Dec 2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3