Abstract
AbstractGenetics has traditionally enabled the reliable diagnosis of patients with rare genetic disorders, thus empowering the key role of today’s clinical geneticists in providing healthcare. With the many novel technologies that have expanded the genetic toolkit, genetics is increasingly evolving beyond rare disease diagnostics. When placed in a transition context—like we do here—clinical genetics is likely to become a fully integral part of future healthcare and clinical genetic expertise will be required increasingly outside traditional clinical genetic settings. We explore transition effects on the thinking (culture), organizing (structure), and performing (practice) in clinical genetics, taking genetic healthcare in Estonia, Finland, and the Netherlands as examples. Despite clearly distinct healthcare histories, all three countries have initially implemented genetic healthcare in a rather similar fashion: as a diagnostic tool for predominantly rare congenital diseases, with clinical geneticists as the main providers. Dynamics at different levels, such as emerging technologies, biobanks and data infrastructure, and legislative frameworks, may require development of a new system attuned with the demands and (historic) context of specific countries. Here, we provide an overview of genetic service provisions in Estonia, Finland, and the Netherlands to consider the impact of historic and recent events on prospective developments in genetic healthcare.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Epidemiology
Reference106 articles.
1. Aartsma-Rus A, Fokkema I, Verschuuren J, Ginjaar I, van Deutekom J, van Ommen G-J, den Dunnen JT (2009) Theoretic applicability of antisense-mediated exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutations. Hum Mutat 30(3):293–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20918
2. Abacan M, Alsubaie L, Barlow-Stewart K, Caanen B, Cordier C, Courtney E, Davoine E, Edwards J, Elackatt NJ, Gardiner K, Guan Y, Huang L-H, Malmgren CI, Kejriwal S, Kim HJ, Lambert D, Lantigua-Cruz PA, Lee JMH, Lodahl M, Wicklund C (2019) The global state of the genetic counseling profession. Eur J Hum Genet 27(2):183–197. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0252-x
3. Ahola-Launonen J (2016) Social responsibility and healthcare in Finland. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180116000098
4. Alver M, Palover M, Saar A, Läll K, Zekavat SM, Tõnisson N, Leitsalu L, Reigo A, Nikopensius T, Ainla T, Kals M, Mägi R, Gabriel SB, Eha J, Lander ES, Irs A, Philippakis A, Marandi T, Natarajan P, Esko T (2019) Recall by genotype and cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in a population-based biobank from Estonia. Genet Med 21(5):1173–1180. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0311-2
5. Amsterdam UMC, Locatie VUmc - Mijn DNAmedicatiepas. Website accessed February 2, 2021, from https://www.vumc.nl/zorg/expertisecentra-en-specialismen/apotheek-en-klinische-farmacologie/mijn-dnamedicatiepas.htm
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献