Psychosocial approaches to participation in BRCA1/2 genetic risk assessment among African American women: a systematic review

Author:

Sherman Kerry A.,Miller Suzanne M.,Shaw Laura-Kate,Cavanagh Karen,Sheinfeld Gorin Sherri

Abstract

Abstract Breast cancer is a significant health concern for African American women. Nonetheless, uptake of genetic risk assessment (including both genetic counseling and testing) for breast cancer gene mutations among these populations remains low. This paper systematically reviews cognitive (i.e., beliefs) and affective (i.e., emotions) factors influencing BRCA1/2 genetic risk assessment among African American women as well as psychosocial interventions to facilitate informed decision making in this population. A systematic search of CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO was undertaken, yielding 112 published studies. Of these, 18 met the eligibility criteria. African American woman are likely to participate in genetic risk assessment if they are knowledgeable about cancer genetics, perceive a high risk of developing breast cancer, have low expectancies of stigmatization from medical professionals, view themselves as independent from family, and have fatalistic beliefs and a future temporal orientation. Anticipated negative affective responses, such as an inability to “handle” the results of testing, are barriers to uptake. Specific perceptions, beliefs, and emotional factors are associated with genetic risk assessment among African American women. Understanding these factors is key in the development of interventions to facilitate informed decision making in this population.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Epidemiology

Reference53 articles.

1. Armstrong K, Micco E, Carney A, Stopfer J, Putt M (2005) Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. JAMA 293(14):1729–1736. doi:10.1001/jama.293.14.1729

2. Bouchard L, Blancquaert I, Eisinger F, Foulkes WD, Evans G, Sobol H, Julian-Reynier C (2004) Prevention and genetic testing for breast cancer: variations in medical decisions. Soc Sci Med 58(6):1085–1096

3. Bowen D, Hickman KM, Powers D (1997) Importance of psychological variables in understanding risk perceptions and breast cancer screening of African American women. Womens Health 3(3–4):227–242

4. Cancer Institute NSW (2013a) Information for people and families with a BRCA2 gene fault (mutation). Cancer Institute NSW. https://www.eviq.org.au/Protocol/tabid/66/categoryid/441/id/765/Information+for+people+and+families+with+a+BRCA2+gene+fault+%28mutation%29.aspx. Accessed 20 Nov 2012

5. Cancer Institute NSW (2013b) Information for people and families with a faulty BRCA1 gene (mutation). Cancer Institute NSW. https://www.eviq.org.au/Protocol/tabid/66/categoryid/441/id/764/Information+for+people+and+families+with+a+faulty+BRCA1+gene+%28mutation%29.aspx. Accessed 2 Nov 2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3