How genomic information is accessed in clinical practice: an electronic survey of UK general practitioners

Author:

Evans W. R. H.ORCID,Tranter J.,Rafi I.ORCID,Hayward J.,Qureshi N.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractGenomic technologies are having an increasing impact across medicine, including primary care. To enable their wider adoption and realize their potential, education of primary health-care practitioners will be required. To enable the development of such resources, understanding where GPs currently access genomic information is needed. One-hundred fifty-nine UK GPs completed the survey in response to an open invitation, between September 2017 and September 2018. Questions were in response to 4 clinical genomic scenarios, with further questions exploring resources used for rare disease patients, direct-to-consumer genetic testing and collecting a family history. Respondents were most commonly GP principals (independent GPs who own their clinic) (64.8%), aged 35–49 years (54%), worked as a GP for more than 15 years (44%) and practiced within suburban locations (typically wealthier) (50.3%). The most popular ‘just in time’ education source for all clinical genomic scenarios were online primary care focussed resources with general Internet search engines also popular. For genomic continuous medical education, over 70% of respondents preferred online learning. Considering specific scenarios, local guidelines were a popular resource for the familial breast cancer scenario. A large proportion (41%) had not heard of Genomics England’s 100,000 genome project. Few respondents (4%) would access rare disease specific Internet resources (Orphanet, OMIM). Twenty-five percent of respondents were unsure how to respond to a direct-to-consumer commercial genetic test query, with 41% forwarding such queries to local genetic services. GPs require concise, relevant, primary care focussed resources in trusted and familiar online repositories of information. Inadequate genetic education of GPs could increase burden on local genetic services.

Funder

University of Nottingham

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Genetics(clinical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Epidemiology

Reference31 articles.

1. (EPOC), E. P. a. O. o. C (2015). EPOC Taxonomy. https://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-taxonomy. Accessed 11th October 2019

2. 23andme (2019) Written evidence submitted by 23andMe to Science and Technology Committee. Available at: http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/science-and-technology-committee/commercial-genomics/written/101018.pdf. Accessed 02 Oct 2019

3. Braithwaite D, Sutton S, Smithson WH, Emery J (2002) Internet-based risk assessment and decision support for the management of familial cancer in primary care: a survey of GPs’ attitudes and intentions. Family Practice, 19(6):587–590

4. Burke S, Stone A, Bedward J, Thomas H, Farndon P (2006) A “neglected part of the curriculum” or “of limited use”? Views on genetics training by nongenetics medical trainees and implications for delivery. Genet Med 8(2):109–115. https://doi.org/10.109701/gim.0000200159.19920.b5

5. Burton H, Hall A, Kroese M, Raza S (2017) Genomics in mainstream clinical pathways. PHG Foundation, Cambridge, UK 978–1–907198-30-4, Available at: https://www.phgfoundation.org/documents/PHGF-Genomics-in-mainstream-clinical-pathways.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept 2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3