Abstract
AbstractThis review aimed to systematically map and summarize the status of animal health and welfare in organic production. The prevalence of diseases and behavioural effects in organic dairy cow, beef cattle, sheep, pig, laying hen and broiler chicken were discussed in the context of the organic values and current knowledge on animal health and welfare. In total 166 peer-reviewed scientific publications between 2008 and 2020 were included. No strong evidence for neither inferior nor distinctly higher animal welfare in organic compared with conventional production could be supported. The welfare status of organic livestock is in general good in relation to the OIE definition of animal health and welfare. However, organic systems are still facing several challenges related to animal health and the arising of goal conflicts due to management and practical implications. Greater possibilities to perform species-specific behaviours in organic production systems, however, indicate that the organic standards offer a good framework for high animal welfare management. For organic dairy farmers, the main health problems are similar to those of non-organic farms; especially mastitis and lameness need improvement. Parasites, together with mastitis and lamb mortality, are important welfare issues in organic sheep production. Piglet mortality, leg problems, parasite load and increasing respiratory problems are of major relevance in organic pig production. For organic laying hens, major health challenges relate to feather pecking and cannibalism, parasites and possibilities to express species-specific behaviours. For organic broilers, dermatitis of footpads, hocks and breast are reported as main health issues.
Funder
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference197 articles.
1. Alban L, Petersen JV, Busch ME (2015) A comparison between lesions found during meat inspection of finishing pigs raised under organic/free-range conditions and conventional, indoor conditions. Porc Health Manag 1:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2055-5660-1-4
2. Arroyo L, Valent D, Carreras R, Pena R, Sabria J, Velarde A, Bassols A (2019) Housing and road transport modify the brain neurotransmitter systems of pigs: do pigs raised in different conditions cope differently with unknown environments? PLoS One 14(1):e0210406. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210406
3. Astorga RJ, Gomez Laguna J, Hernandez Garcia M, Echeita Sarrionandia A, Quiros Carmona S, Luque Moreno I, Gibert EC (2010) Surveillance on Salmonella prevalence in Iberian pigs raised in free-range system. AGRIS Agricultural Science and Technology Information No 64:26–33 http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=ES2010000405
4. Barker ZE, Leach KA, Whay HR, Bell NJ, Main DCJ (2010) Assessment of lameness prevalence and associated risk factors in dairy herds in England and Wales. J Dairy Sci 93:932–941
5. Bartussek H, Leeb CH and Held S (2000) Animal need index for cattle ANI 35 L/2000, cattle. Federal Research Institute for Agriculture in Alpine Regions BAL pp 1-20. Gumpenstein 8952: Irdning, Austria
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献