Author:
Anusic Ivana,Lucas Richard E.,Donnellan M. Brent
Funder
National Institute on Aging
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference37 articles.
1. Anusic, I., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2015). Comparing the reliability and validity of global self-report measures of subjective well-being to day reconstruction measures. Unpublished manuscript.
2. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Oerlemans, W., & Sonnentag, S. (2013). Workaholism and daily recovery: A day reconstruction study of leisure activities. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 87–107.
3. Clark, L. A., Watson, D., & Leeka, J. (1989). Diurnal variation in the positive affects. Motivation and Emotion,
13, 205–234.
4. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larsen, R. E. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,
175, 526–536.
5. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist,
55, 34–43.
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献