Abstract
AbstractWhile material deprivation is often used to measure poverty, analyses focusing on the measurement of material deprivation are scarce. This study provides new information on material deprivation by analyzing how differences in the considerations of necessities and possession of deprivation items among all respondents and within population subgroups affect group-level differences in material deprivation in Finland. In line with many previous studies on material deprivation, this study focused on age groups. There is a significant age gradient regarding considerations of necessities, possession, and deprivation of many deprivation items. On average, younger adults experience material deprivation more often than older adults do. This study considers the differences in the considerations of necessities and possession of deprivation items using different weighting approaches. The study found that these differences are not largely transmitted to deprivation indices. Two causes of this finding were found: (1) individuals, on average, are not deprived of items in which there are differences between age groups regarding consensus and prevalence and (2) in those items in which deprivation is high, the consensus and the prevalence rates are often lower compared to other items. The results provide new information on which factors are important when using weighting approaches to measure material deprivation.
Funder
University of Turku (UTU) including Turku University Central Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference42 articles.
1. Ahonen, K., and Vaittinen, R. (2015). Eläkeikäisten kulutus Suomessa 1985–2012. Eläketurvakeskuksen raportteja 06/2015. Helsinki: Eläketurvakeskus.
2. Atkinson, T., Cantillon, B., Marlier, E., & Nolan, B. (2002). Social indicators: The EU and social inclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bailey, N. (2020). Measuring Poverty Efficiently Using Adaptive Deprivation Scales. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02283-1.
4. Boarini, R., and D'Ercole, M. M. (2006). Measures of material deprivation in OECD countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 37, OECD Publishing.
5. Deutsch, J., Guio, A.-C., Pomati, M., & Silber, J. (2015). Material Deprivation in Europe: Which Expenditures are Curtailed First? Social Indicators Research, 120(3), 723–740.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献