Relative Standing and Political Participation

Author:

Fransman TinaORCID,von Fintel MarisaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe significance of absolute income has consistently been highlighted in the literature as an important factor shaping individuals’ propensity to engage in political participation. However, considerably less research has been done on the relationship between relative income and individuals’ propensity to engage in both conventional and unconventional forms of political participation. Using relative income to quantify relative standing, this paper explores the relationship between relative standing and political participation in South Africa. Results show that individuals’ relative standing had a divergent relationship with their propensity to engage in voting and protest. More specifically, the results showed that South Africans with a higher relative standing, i.e., those who experienced relative privilege were more likely to engage in voting, while those with a lower relative standing, i.e., those who experienced relative deprivation, were more likely to engage in protest participation.

Funder

Stellenbosch University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference90 articles.

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press.

2. Akay, A. & Martinsson, P. (2008). Does relative income matter for the very poor? Evidence from rural Ethiopia. In IZA Discussion papers 3 812. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

3. Anderson, C.J. & Beramendi, P. (2005). Economic inequality, redistribution, and political inequality. Presented at the “Income Inequality, Representation, and Democracy: Europe in Comparative Perspective” conference, Maxwell School, Syracuse University, May 2005.

4. Anderson, C. J., & Beramendi, P. (2008). Income, inequality, and electoral participation. In P. Beramendi & C. J. Anderson (Eds.), Democracy, inequality and representation in comparative perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

5. Ansolabehere, S., De Figueiredo, J. M., & Snyder, J. M., Jr. (2003). Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 105–130.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3