Abstract
AbstractBenchmarking the analysis of countries' performance in terms of sustainable development helps to understand the success factors of countries that over perform and to target priority issues of others with lower performance. However, assessing sustainable development comes with methodological challenges, including indicator standardization, aggregation and weighting. Our study significantly contributes to the measure of sustainable development by providing a new approach based on an extended Hellwig method. After describing the main limitations of existing methodologies, this paper's aim is twofold. First, we show that the proposed analytical framework allows for comparing the sustainable performance of EU countries on the national level. The extended Hellwig method takes into consideration EU targets and/or national targets in building patterns of development. Second, this framework is tested as a part of the evaluation of the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy in the education area. The results obtained using the extended Hellwig method were compared with those obtained by means of the Education Index, TOPSIS and Ward technique. Our analysis showed the significant disparities in the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy recommendations in the education area in 2015.
Funder
Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education
Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education under subsidy for maintaining the research potential of the Faculty of Economy and Finance, University of Bialystok
Bialystok University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference63 articles.
1. Albareda-Tiana, S., Vidal-Raméntol, S., & Fernández-Morilla, M. (2018). Implementing the sustainable development goals at University level. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 473–497.
2. Azapagic, A., & Perdan, S. (2005a). An integrated sustainability decision-support framework: Problem structuring, part I. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12(2), 98–111.
3. Azapagic, A., & Perdan, S. (2005b). An integrated sustainability decision-support framework: Methods and tools for problem analysis, part II. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12(2), 112–131.
4. Bandura, R. (2011). Composite indicators and rankings: Inventory 2011. Office of Development Studies, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York: Technical report.
5. Baster, N. (1972). Measuring development: The role and adequacy of development indicators. London: Frank Cass.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献