Abstract
AbstractThe Leave No One Behind principle is at the core of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development and acknowledges that poverty is multidimensional and should be examined at individual level. Notwithstanding this, most empirical studies use the household as the unit of analysis for multidimensional poverty measurement. However, estimation of poverty levels at household-level underestimates poverty levels of the society and does not capture intra-household inequalities. The objective of this study is two-fold: (1) developing a country-specific individual-level multidimensional poverty measure; and (2) providing estimates of multidimensional poverty for Botswana. This study contributes to the limited literature on individual-level multidimensional poverty measurement. Empirically, this study offers the first attempt to estimate a nationally relevant and context-specific multidimensional poverty index for Botswana using the individual as a unit of analysis. The results reveal that an estimated 46.2% of individuals are considered multidimensionally poor based on individual-level analysis. This figure is higher than the household-level estimate of 36.5%, which indicates that using the household as a unit of analysis leads to underestimating poverty levels in the society. The results show that on average, the multidimensionally poor are deprived in 47.4% of all indicators under consideration. This finding indicates that multidimensional poverty intensity is also a considerable concern in Botswana. These findings warrant policy interventions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference85 articles.
1. Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions and human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205.
2. Alkire, S., & Apablaza, M. (2016). Multidimensional poverty in Europe 2006–2012: Illustrating a methodology. OPHI Working Paper 74. Oxford: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI).
3. Alkire, S., & Fang, Y. (2019). Dynamics of multidimensional poverty and uni-dimensional income poverty: An evidence of stability analysis from China. Social Indicators Research, 42(1), 25–64.
4. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. E. (2011a). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.
5. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. E. (2011b). Understanding and misunderstanding of multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 289–314.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献