Abstract
AbstractAlthough flexible working has expanded rapidly, especially during the pandemic, biased views against flexible workers – namely, flexibility stigma - are still prevalent and returning. Flexibility stigma hinders worker’s take up of flexible working arrangements and can make flexible working arrangements result in negative outcomes for worker’s well-being and productivity. This study examines how national cultural and policy contexts shape flexibility stigma levels within a country. We use a multilevel approach using the Eurobarometer dataset of 2018, covering 28 European countries, matched with national level aggregate data on policy and culture. Results show that in countries with a more work-life balance work culture and egalitarian gender norms, we see less prevalence of flexibility stigma. Similarly, in countries with generous family-friendly policies, workers are less likely to have negative perception towards flexible working. Finally, stronger bargaining positions of workers, may it be through stronger union power or through better labour market conditions, helps remove stigmatised views around workers who use flexible working arrangements. This study evidences the importance of contexts that shape views around flexible working, to help us better understand policy changes needed to ensure better flexible working practices.
Funder
H2020 Society
Economic and Social Research Council
National research foundation Korea
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference81 articles.
1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158.
2. Alexander, A., De Smet, A., Langstaff, M., & Ravid, D. (2021). What employees are saying about the future of remote work 1st April 2021. online: McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/what-employees-are-saying-about-the-future-of-remote-work?cid=soc-web (accessed 6th April 2021).
3. Awada, M., Lucas, G., Becerik-Gerber, B., & Roll, S. (2021). Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on office worker productivity and work experience. Work, 69(4), 1171–1189
4. Batt, R., & Valcour, M. (2003). Human resources practices as predictors of Work Family outcomes and employee turnover. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(2), 189–220.
5. Been, W. M., van der Lippe, T., den Dulk, L., Guerreiro, M. D. D. H., Mrčela, A. K., & Niemistö, C. (2017). European top managers’ support for work-life arrangements. Social Science Research, 65(July 2017), 60–74.